Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I suppose this is really an ontological question about how anyone is "qualified" to do or say anything, ever.
Sorta. But it's more about how do you choose the 50 networks that get the press briefing when 1000s want it. CNN and WaPo simply have more tradition; they are poor at reporting. It shouldn't be a big deal if Joe Schmo gets access over them.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer
Good question. We should implement a licensing and testing scheme!
Begin with the POTUS, WHY should he/she be allowed to make-up events like terror attacks and spew lies like "thousands and thousands" celebrating the 9/11 attacks in the streets of Jersey City and have them reported as fact?
Why should they get access at all? We all have cameras on our phones and can set up a blog to share our opinions for free.
Why should CNN get to cover the President over Joe Schmo with a blog?
Back in the day you needed news networks with their equipment, but nowadays we can all live broadcast and disseminate the news worldwide.
WAPO's investigation exposed the 37th POTUS Admin.
The last Admin to so consistently push back on media, especially so- called liberal media, was #37.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.