Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-26-2017, 02:30 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,097,165 times
Reputation: 6135

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dothetwist View Post
So, for TWO years the Commander in Chief did not order ground actions in Yemen because there were no targets worthy of losing an American. Then Mr. General-Wanna-Be tRump is in charge for a week, and he orders a raid that results in an American death in vain.

Great. Hope all you trumpholes are happy to hear this news. Shame.

Obama administration signed off on the mission.

This mission was put together under the Obama administration, who signed off on the mission. The decision was made to conduct the mission during a moonless night, which wasn't until after Trump took office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2017, 02:33 PM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,818,113 times
Reputation: 25191
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I blame him for both as we had no business participating and he could have saw to it that we didn't.



No, his responsibility and blame is in us being there at all.
We have been there, for years, and many resources were dumped into the Yemen raid under Obama. Trump though giving the final authorization, had a very small role. Sort of like Clinton and NAFTA, where all the work was done before he was president and he merely signed on something that the previous administration put a lot of work into.

Imagine, this mission is the one you heard about, there are others that you had no idea that they occurred, and will not know unless someone leaks info or the gov declassifies. I am sure with this mission, they debated to make it a CIA mission, in that they will not have to disclose it happened, or keep it military where they have to disclose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2017, 02:35 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,465,032 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
Obama administration signed off on the mission.

This mission was put together under the Obama administration, who signed off on the mission
No Obama did not sign off on the mission - that's why didn't happen under him. Obama didn't want to put US boots on the ground in Yemen - esp. for this risky mission (landing 5 miles away for a sneak attack on an armed compound warned by a sudden increase in air activity.).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2017, 02:40 PM
 
5,722 posts, read 5,800,250 times
Reputation: 4381
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
No Obama did not sign off on the mission - that's why didn't happen under him. Obama didn't want to put US boots on the ground in Yemen - esp. for this risky mission.
Another misinformed leftie I see that reads the NY Times. So sad.

The military presented the plan to TRump with the intelligence they had. Presidents don't come up with military plans. They thought it was a good plan that would be successful. This has absolutely nothing to do with Trump.

Col. John Thomas :

ndeed, Col. John Thomas, a spokesperson for US Central Command (CENTCOM), the combatant command responsible for operations in the Middle East, acknowledged as much in a statement Wednesday: "CENTCOM asks for operations we believe have a good chance for success and when we ask for authorization we certainly believe there is a chance of successful operations based on our planning.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2017, 02:43 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,465,032 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
No Obama did not sign off on the mission - that's why didn't happen under him. Obama didn't want to put US boots on the ground in Yemen - esp. for this risky mission.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanderlust76
Another misinformed leftie I see that reads the NY Times. So sad.

The military presented the plan to TRump with the intelligence they had. Presidents don't come up with military plans. They thought it was a good plan that would be successful. This has absolutely nothing to do with Trump.

Col. John Thomas :

ndeed, Col. John Thomas, a spokesperson for US Central Command (CENTCOM), the combatant command responsible for operations in the Middle East, acknowledged as much in a statement Wednesday: "CENTCOM asks for operations we believe have a good chance for success and when we ask for authorization we certainly believe there is a chance of successful operations based on our planning.”
The plan was presented to Obama and Obama did not sign off on the mission.
The plan was presented to Trump and Trump did sign off on the mission.
Yet you still blame Obama and call it "Obama's plan"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2017, 02:43 PM
 
5,722 posts, read 5,800,250 times
Reputation: 4381
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
Obama did not sign off on the mission. Trump did.
THat means absolutely nothing. Obama was an idiot at anything foreign related. Stop avoiding the point. The military leaders felt that it would be successful if you want to point fingers it would be at them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2017, 02:43 PM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,663,943 times
Reputation: 8602
Quote:
Originally Posted by dothetwist View Post
Because our current Idiot in Chief is a dufus; he is UNQUALIFIED for his job. 60% in latest NBC poll says he doesn't understand enough to be in his job.

He will listen to Putin before he listens to his own cabinet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2017, 02:45 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxus View Post
We have been there, for years, and many resources were dumped into the Yemen raid under Obama. Trump though giving the final authorization, had a very small role. Sort of like Clinton and NAFTA, where all the work was done before he was president and he merely signed on something that the previous administration put a lot of work into.

Imagine, this mission is the one you heard about, there are others that you had no idea that they occurred, and will not know unless someone leaks info or the gov declassifies. I am sure with this mission, they debated to make it a CIA mission, in that they will not have to disclose it happened, or keep it military where they have to disclose.
None of that addresses the fact that we have no business being there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2017, 02:46 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
No Obama did not sign off on the mission - that's why didn't happen under him. Obama didn't want to put US boots on the ground in Yemen - esp. for this risky mission (landing 5 miles away for a sneak attack on an armed compound warned by a sudden increase in air activity.).
There were already boots on the ground in Yemen under Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2017, 02:51 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post
Will there be an investigation?
More likely there will be a cover-up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top