Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not true, and you are out of your mind if you think he was lying under oath.
They have in some places been playing the questions Sessions was asked and in no way do they match up with the questions the fake news reports claim he was answering. Sessions never said he never met with Russians as a Senator, they all meet with people. This is the left wing desperation that is going to help Democrats see an even bigger loss in 2018.
Did you actually watch the hearing? I don't care what's reported - just listen to the actual words coming out of Session's mouth.
This is just weird. Why lie about something like this? Why even mention "I did not have any communication with the Russians" when he wasn't even asked if HE had any communication with the Russians.
Sessions was asked by Congress if he spoke with the Russian Ambassador during the campaign which he replied no.
They never asked him if he met with the Russian Ambassador when he was a Senator which no doubt he would have said yes to because it is common practice to meet with politicians from other countries.
The difference in the meetings and questions that Congress proposed have been muddled together in typical Democrat fashion, when they are trying to make their point and that is what they are trying to hang him with.
It is all "trumped" up accusations that have been kept alive by the Liberal media in their feigned shock.
Can you please quote us SPECIFICALLY what he was questioned and SPECIFICALLY what he answered please?
Sessions was asked by Congress if he spoke with the Russian Ambassador during the campaign which he replied no.
They never asked him if he met with the Russian Ambassador when he was a Senator which no doubt he would have said yes to because it is common practice to meet with politicians from other countries.
The difference in the meetings and questions that Congress proposed have been muddled together in typical Democrat fashion, when they are trying to make their point and that is what they are trying to hang him with.
It is all "trumped" up accusations that have been kept alive by the Liberal media in their feigned shock.
EXACTLY, but they want the issue, so don't expect them to respect a truth.
This is why they are dying out and are not trusted anymore.
They are going to get smashed the way this is going in 2018. Hopefully Obama will come out to clinch their defeat.
The issue is that people (particularly those close and/or connected with Trump) are doing so and being super sketchy about it (e.g. lying under oath (even going out of their way to mention themselves as Sessions did in his hearing - when the question wasn't even about him!!), or giving weird answers to simple questions about it).
It makes the entire relationship between Trump and Russia very suspicious. When you throw in the suspicions of Russia's involvement in election interference and Trump's odd praise of Putin/Russia over the years, it makes the entire thing more explosive and interesting.
Why are people continually misunderstanding this simple point???
Your suspicions and those of your leftist friends, or your opinion that there are "explosive" events happening are not proof of anything. The incessant effort to discredit Trump with phantom connections to Russia is a crock of c**p that nobody is buying except the left (if indeed even they really believe it). You can nitpick the details all you like, but the underlying premise remains a crock. Are you people really going to keep this up for the next 47 months? Good. See you in 2020.
Your suspicions and those of your leftist friends, or your opinion that there are "explosive" events happening is not proof of anything. The incessant effort to discredit Trump with phantom connections to Russia is a crock of c**p that nobody is buying except the left. You can nitpick the details all you like, but the underlying premise remains a crock. Are you people really going to keep this up for the next 47 months? Good. See you in 2020.
Why do people misunderstand this simple point?
That poster does the same thing in the Climate Science threads. Make no mistake, they are not "balanced" or "objective", they are only claiming to appear as such.
Clinton broke the law, we specifically can point to the EXACT DAMN LAW and the FBI DIRECTOR said she did VIOLATE THE LAW, but then gave some stupid excuse as why she shouldn't be charged which did not excuse her violation!!!
PLEASE PUSH THIS WITH ME!!!!
Please argue this so I can quote you the EXACT law, Comey's testimony confirming such and show your ignorance.
Why isn't Trump following through on his investigation if we're so certain she broke the law?
Sessions lied under oath to Congress. That is against the law. If Sessions did not recall his two+ meetings with Russian Diplomats, he's not fit to be the AG.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
