Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Send me $10 and you will receive my new book about how the government covered up the evidence for a 10,000 year old earth, a historical Adam and Eve, and the evidence that global warming stopped in 1998.
It is becoming clear that not only do many scientists dispute the asserted global warming crisis, but these skeptical scientists may indeed form a scientific consensus.
Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.
The survey results show geoscientists (also known as earth scientists) and engineers hold similar views as meteorologists. Two recent surveys of meteorologists (summarized here and here) revealed similar skepticism of alarmist global warming claims.
According to the newly published survey of geoscientists and engineers, merely 36 percent of respondents fit the “Comply with Kyoto” model. The scientists in this group “express the strong belief that climate change is happening, that it is not a normal cycle of nature, and humans are the main or central cause.”
I don't know what your credentials are, but seriously why would you believe James Taylor? He lies almost as much as Trump, and has no training in science.
“The evidence is powerful, straightforward, and damning. NASA satellite instruments precisely measuring global temperatures show absolutely no warming during the past the past 10 years.” James Taylor..
Both arguing over consensus, but neither realizing consensus is not a component of establishing validity in science.
But you'd be surprised how often consensus is the means for making supposedly scientific judgments. If you present a scientific research paper to a panel of three faculty members, to be granted an advanced degree, if two vote against you and the research results, it is rejected. Maybe those two had personal grudges and the science had nothing to do with it. Politics often rules over science.
Send me $10 and you will receive my new book about how the government covered up the evidence for a 10,000 year old earth, a historical Adam and Eve, and the evidence that global warming stopped in 1998.
Send me $10 and you will receive my new book about how government claims the earth magically appeared 100 billion years ago and that after 100 billion years of constant climate change man began to change the climate even though most scientists know this is a lie.
Send me $10 and you will receive my new book about how government claims the earth magically appeared 100 billion years ago and that after 100 billion years of constant climate change man began to change the climate even though most scientists know this is a lie.
Psh why would he do that everyone knows Jesus invented the earth 6000 years ago. Get real.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
