Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-15-2017, 10:59 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,719,480 times
Reputation: 13868

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"Now MSNBC is trying to push the narrative that Trump leaked his own tax return."

Even if he did, it discredits the lefts (including the LSM) constant chant that he "paid ZERO taxes and gave ZERO to charity"

They have so much egg on their faces we can't tell who they are.

Again IF Trump is behind this, it proves AGAIN how smart he is at letting the LSM and the left bury THEMSELVES.

ONLY the very far left sheep will believe ANYTHING they say.
LOL, MSNBC, Trump leaking his own taxes. Wait! They are upset that he didn't, now their upset because he may have. The liberal reality show keeps getting better and better LOL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-15-2017, 10:59 AM
 
416 posts, read 252,939 times
Reputation: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonnymarkjiz View Post
Why didn't Maddow just read it, find out he paid a crapload of taxes in 2005, and decide to ....NOT publish this story and not make it a big deal?
She read it, she just wanted good ratings.

First their loyalty is to their own pocket book, then it's to whatever propaganda they're pushing. Now it's spin time, but prior it was being a ratings ***** even when she knew it would help Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2017, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Land of Thought and Flow
8,323 posts, read 15,164,623 times
Reputation: 4957
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Only "destroyed" to someone who has zero knowledge about how tax brackets and tax calculations work.

Sanders makes considerably less money which puts him in a lower tax bracket. With a taxable income of $140,994, less than half his income is being taxed at the 25% bracket. And even if Sanders had claimed $0 in deductions, his effective tax rate would still be less than 25% of his net income.

That's kind of the point of our tax system. Just because you earned enough to reach a higher bracket of taxation does not mean every dollar you earn is taxed at that amount.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2017, 11:01 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,719,480 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonnymarkjiz View Post
I'm a lefty and I agree 100% with this.

It's sad how so many people who are considered liberals (ya know, the open minded people, supposedly) can't see this and that it hurt them and made Trump look better by debunking their "TRUMP HASNT PAID TAXES IN 20 YEARS CLAIM".

Why didn't Maddow just read it, find out he paid a crapload of taxes in 2005, and decide to ....NOT publish this story and not make it a big deal?

And for those who claim she wasn't making it a big deal, no. It basically FLOODED my Facebook and Twitter feeds last night.....DURING the season finale of This Is Us, which was super-hyped to begin with.

Like I said in an earlier post, it made me laugh and embarrassed of why I'm a liberal.
It was 2 pages, an easy read, I'm still wondering why she didn't read it before making a big deal about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2017, 11:02 AM
 
58,973 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
That is why she is a talk show host and not an attorney, if Maddow didn't solicit getting the documents it is not illegal.
" if Maddow didn't solicit getting the documents it is not illegal"

Are you a criminal attorney?

I always thought RECEIVING stolen goods was against the law and so is REVEALING someone's tax returns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2017, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaskingIguana View Post
He had 198 million in revenue. And he had an operational loss of 915M. A business loss is a legitimate loss and carryover.

Have you ever run a business in your life?

There is no hypocrisy. The 1 million of dollars he paid in taxes that year was 1 million too much.
All we know is the amount of the loss, there are no details but there are many games that can be played with real estate. The point is that some were trying to paint him as the common man because he paid his share in one year, that is not always the case. Paying the going rate in one year doesn't prove a thing but a $915M loss in one year is an eye opener.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2017, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
" if Maddow didn't solicit getting the documents it is not illegal"

Are you a criminal attorney?

I always thought RECEIVING stolen goods was against the law and so is REVEALING someone's tax returns.
Well where is the big lawsuit on the release of his 1995 return several months back, Trump has never been shy about suing.


Where are the lawsuits against those companies that published the DNC emails, or does this only work one way.

Last edited by Goodnight; 03-15-2017 at 11:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2017, 11:05 AM
 
Location: SW Florida
14,928 posts, read 12,126,747 times
Reputation: 24777
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
I don't expect there to be a bombshell in Trumps tax returns. He isn't super wealthy and he doesn't pay any taxes. No one will be surprised.
LOL, guess you were surprised. Or disappointed, maybe.

Shattuck: Rachel Maddow left with nothing after fake news report | Boston Herald
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2017, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,594,686 times
Reputation: 7801
Interesting. Reading the last few pages, Trump fans are high fiving each other thinking this makes Trump look good.


More to come...and I don't mean from Maddow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2017, 11:06 AM
 
416 posts, read 252,939 times
Reputation: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
All we know is the amount of the loss, there are no details but there are many games that can be played with real estate. The point is that some were trying to paint him as the common man because he paid his share in one year, that is not always the case. Paying the going rate in one year doesn't prove a thing but a $915M loss in one year is an eye opener.
Not really, this is why I asked if you ever run a business before.

With his properties alone, we expect him to have a depreciation of 100 + million a year regardless. This is a normal tax write off for those who own properties, he probably owns billion dollars worth of properties.

Then there is depreciation on his boat, plane, various cars.

Nothing wrong with it. The point is a business can have a high revenue and still have a huge loss. That's how businesses sometimes works and why Uncle Sam allows the loss to be carried over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top