Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would you support war with North Korea?
Hell yeah 17 11.04%
No way 107 69.48%
Undecided 30 19.48%
Voters: 154. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Northwest Peninsula
6,227 posts, read 3,409,932 times
Reputation: 4372

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NLVgal View Post
All of these little undeclared, half-assed wars are a disaster. War is serious business, and in my opinion, it should be engaged in no-holds-barred as if survival depended on it, or not at all.
I agree 100% and I also agree with Trump saying he will not micromanage the military.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,521,305 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by rantiquity View Post
I don't recall or believe the US military lost a singe military battle during the Vietnam war. What beat us was the inability of both the America people and the politicians in Washington to have the courage to allow the military to run the war and to win.
If the military had a free hand I believe the war would have ended after about two years with three quarters less in the lost of lives. Still not good but we did have an obligation set forth by the SEATO treaties.
You're completely wrong, and anyone who knows anything about that war knows this. Robert McNamara lied when he kept saying we would win. He admitted this. Gen. Westmoreland knew little or nothing about Vietnam when he was made supreme commander. Journalists who had been in the country for 10 years knew far more about the country and Westmoreland demonized them in the same fashion that Trump is doing it today.

You believe the lies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:51 AM
 
Location: Northwest Peninsula
6,227 posts, read 3,409,932 times
Reputation: 4372
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
America is not a military dictatorship..................yet. All our wars are controlled by politicians.
No they weren't. WWI and II were not controlled by politicians. Not until the Korea conflict was the Military ham stringed. Vietnam was a cluster f....k and the US military was not in charge.
At least in the first Iraqi invasion the Generals were given a freer hand but Bush the Elder pulled the military out before they totally destroyed Iraq's ability to come back militarily. That was the reason for the second Iraqi invasion. The military was again hand stringed by the bad rules of engagement which has prolonged that war continuing now.

Quote:
In America, military force is just one tool in the diplomatic tool box. War is just an extreme extension of diplomacy. Our constitution dictates that elected representatives of the people will decide how, where and when to conduct a war against another nation.
Unfortunately that is why wars fought with that in mind is why they last so long with a lot of unnecessary deaths.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:55 AM
 
25,847 posts, read 16,528,639 times
Reputation: 16025
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Not a damn thing.

The United States has ZERO national interests in fighting North Korea.
You should stick to checkers and let the smart people play chess. If you cannot see the strategic importance in that area you should just stop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Northwest Peninsula
6,227 posts, read 3,409,932 times
Reputation: 4372
Quote:
Originally Posted by AfriqueNY View Post
I think the uneducated confuse war with genocide. You can commit genocide and kill every person in the country. Is that what you mean? Is that winning the war? Explain. Because I am offended by people who say that my relatives who fought and died for the past wars were just "playing around". USA doesn't do genocide.
Tell that to the hundreds of thousands who lost their lives in places like Dresden Germany, Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Tokyo Japan. But some times genocide can end war and save lives on both side as demonstrated by the A-bombs dropped in Japan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:59 AM
 
Location: NC
1,873 posts, read 2,407,437 times
Reputation: 1825
Has there been a country we've attacked/intervened (vs retaliated) that's turned out well? Korea? Vietnam? Afghanistan? Iraq? Libya? Our batting average hasn't been that good, and our inability to predict how much money, lives, years they'll take equally poor. Suggests we regularly don't know what we're getting ourselves into...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,662,744 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
You should stick to checkers and let the smart people play chess. If you cannot see the strategic importance in that area you should just stop.
Obviously, Trump doesn't see the strategic importance of that region, either. If he did, he never would have canceled the TPP.
TPP was a mutual trade agreement between America and 11 other Asian nations that border the Pacific Rim. With TPP they would have aligned with America over the rising tide of China. It did not include China specifically because we wanted to have economic clout in Asia with a multinational economic treaty. Now, those nations are looking to China as their big brother, instead of us.

Trump squandered away that part of the world for America just to impress a bunch of out of work coal miners in appalachia whose jobs are still, never coming back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Northwest Peninsula
6,227 posts, read 3,409,932 times
Reputation: 4372
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
You're completely wrong, and anyone who knows anything about that war knows this. Robert McNamara lied when he kept saying we would win. He admitted this. Gen. Westmoreland knew little or nothing about Vietnam when he was made supreme commander. Journalists who had been in the country for 10 years knew far more about the country and Westmoreland demonized them in the same fashion that Trump is doing it today.

You believe the lies.
I was drafted during the early years of that war.

What would you think Westmoreland would say..'We can't win but lets soldier on'.

So you don't have any evidence about any military battle that the US lost in Vietnam? I thought not. You just move on to a straw man argument.

The Biggest liar of the Vietnam war was the democratic president the one and only LBJ and his Gulf of Tonkin lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 12:11 PM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,095,474 times
Reputation: 9726
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
Obviously, Trump doesn't see the strategic importance of that region, either. If he did, he never would have canceled the TPP.
TPP was a mutual trade agreement between America and 11 other Asian nations that border the Pacific Rim. With TPP they would have aligned with America over the rising tide of China. It did not include China specifically because we wanted to have economic clout in Asia with a multinational economic treaty. Now, those nations are looking to China as their big brother, instead of us.

Trump squandered away that part of the world for America just to impress a bunch of out of work coal miners in appalachia whose jobs are still, never coming back.
Yep. Pulling out of the TPP was a major mistake. Or to put it in Trumpese--a total disaster, okay?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,662,744 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by rantiquity View Post
No they weren't. WWI and II were not controlled by politicians. Not until the Korea conflict was the Military ham stringed. Vietnam was a cluster f....k and the US military was not in charge.
At least in the first Iraqi invasion the Generals were given a freer hand but Bush the Elder pulled the military out before they totally destroyed Iraq's ability to come back militarily. That was the reason for the second Iraqi invasion. The military was again hand stringed by the bad rules of engagement which has prolonged that war continuing now.



Unfortunately that is why wars fought with that in mind is why they last so long with a lot of unnecessary deaths.
What???????? A bunch of revisionist history on your part. You should study WWI a little. WWII was a multinational effort of enormous proportions. All Strategy was approved by the leaders of the nations involved. All Tactics were decided at the military command level. Same as it was in vietnam, Korea, Europe, Russia, Etc.

Do you know the difference between Strategy and Tactics? The government decides the objectives and strategy. The Military decides what tactics to use to carry out the strategy and achieve the objective of the national leadership.
With the exception of a military dictatorship, this is how it's universally done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top