Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2017, 08:30 AM
 
28,164 posts, read 25,305,403 times
Reputation: 16665

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
Exactly, and that is the truth about most anti-wall people. It has nothing to do with the costs, or their claims that it won't work or eminent domain. Too bad they won't fess up to the real truth.
No, its not the truth. No matter how much you want to believe it to be, you are incorrect. I am against the wall because it costs way too much, it will NOT work and I fervently disagree with taking private property for such a silly reason. Its not right and it flies in the face of what our country was founded on. Private property is a huge American principle and one that shouldn't be trampled on without much forethought and for very good reason. A wall is not a good reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2017, 08:50 AM
 
62,958 posts, read 29,141,740 times
Reputation: 18587
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
The cartels and terrorists have the $$$ for boats, submarines, tunnels, aircraft, etc., the wall's not going to stop them. They have the $$$ to buy expensive aircraft for one flight missions, they'll no doubt laugh at any wall as they cross it.

We'll see about that but the wall will deter those looking for work and benefits. Those are the millions that are getting in here. Next lame argument.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Ohio
13,933 posts, read 12,896,363 times
Reputation: 7399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
I'm against it for about 95% of its proposed usages. I think eminent domain should be used in extremely rare cases where it truly benefits the public good, not somebody's pockets.
I think we can agree on this point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top