Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This thread wasn't about superiority, it was about the insanity of what Sweden is doing allowing themselves to be taken over which is in the process of occurring in about another generation or possibly two generations.
This thread was expressly about "superiority"; most particularly about the superiority of the male over the female, as the O/P confirmed himself with his second post:
"My point is that you don't send three females to arrest a man. But the "progressiveness" and "liberal values of equality" make people do crazy things."
All the Liberal crappola was just chaff to get it started on here.
This poster just trolled a bunch of fellow travellers into jumping onto a thread and lending support to the general concept of "male superiority" and "inequality" by thinly disguising it as just another Liberal vs Conservative policy argument normally found on here. Now that's funny!
So what I'm hearing is conservatives would rather have no one there stopping this man's criminal behavior rather than have three female police officers. You guys act like they just sent three women out specifically because they were women. When we all know if those three woman hadn't been sent out then their would be no one getting sent out instead. Lets say we fire all female firefighters and LEO's what do we end up with, understaffed departments worldwide all because right wingers can't let people attempt to do their jobs.
So what I'm hearing is conservatives would rather have no one there stopping this man's criminal behavior rather than have three female police officers. You guys act like they just sent three women out specifically because they were women. When we all know if those three woman hadn't been sent out then their would be no one getting sent out instead. Lets say we fire all female firefighters and LEO's what do we end up with, understaffed departments worldwide all because right wingers can't let people attempt to do their jobs.
I think the conservative point is men should have been hired in the first place instead of women.
Personally I think there should be certain physical standards and anyone that can meet them should be eligible for hire. Those standards should not be lowered because 90+% of women cannot meet them. I know in the town I grew up in you had to be at least 5'10" and a certain weight to be a cop.
In this case no one was harmed. Might not be true next time.
But what your essentially arguing is that these woman were hired just because their women. You do know that unlike most jobs, a Police Officer goes through an Academy before they join, if you can't make the cut you get dropped. Your acting like their was someone to replace these women in the first place. I am telling you that if these women didn't have their jobs, then their wouldn't be a man in their position, instead their would likely be no one in their position. If someone is qualified to be a police officer their not dropped because of how competitive it is to get hire.
So what your telling me is the conservative position is to leave police forces understaffed. You do know that 12% across America is the percent of the police force that is female, and if you look at America and Sweden and most police forces that I know of, standards aren't lowered for women so the women that make it on the force are qualified in the first place.
Unless you advocate raising the standards so that no one can make it besides a select few men and maybe a woman every blue moon on police forces, then we may as well change the police force into the U.S/Swedish etc. Military and call it a day.
This thread wasn't about superiority, it was about the insanity of what Sweden is doing allowing themselves to be taken over which is in the process of occurring in about another generation or possibly two generations.
We all have to admit it : the attempts to subdue the refugee were just pathetic. Then along comes a beefy male Swedish policeman and he backs off the refugee as well. Far be it from a non violent incident. The male refugee could have very well thrown a rock at one of the police. The way the Swedish police are behaving now is one of pure dereliction of duty and flouting their responsibility to not just native Swedes but also the refugees. What kind of message are they sending by submitting to those intent on breaking the law.
But what your essentially arguing is that these woman were hired just because their women. You do know that unlike most jobs, a Police Officer goes through an Academy before they join, if you can't make the cut you get dropped. Your acting like their was someone to replace these women in the first place. I am telling you that if these women didn't have their jobs, then their wouldn't be a man in their position, instead their would likely be no one in their position. If someone is qualified to be a police officer their not dropped because of how competitive it is to get hire.
So what your telling me is the conservative position is to leave police forces understaffed. You do know that 12% across America is the percent of the police force that is female, and if you look at America and Sweden and most police forces that I know of, standards aren't lowered for women so the women that make it on the force are qualified in the first place.
Unless you advocate raising the standards so that no one can make it besides a select few men and maybe a woman every blue moon on police forces, then we may as well change the police force into the U.S/Swedish etc. Military and call it a day.
What I am saying is there were once physical standards that had to be met requiring a minimum height and weight that have been dropped primarily so not to "discriminate" against women. I think it helps to be bigger and stronger when confronting criminals.
We all have to admit it : the attempts to subdue the refugee were just pathetic. Then along comes a beefy male Swedish policeman and he backs off the refugee as well. Far be it from a non violent incident. The male refugee could have very well thrown a rock at one of the police. The way the Swedish police are behaving now is one of pure dereliction of duty and flouting their responsibility to not just native Swedes but also the refugees. What kind of message are they sending by submitting to those intent on breaking the law.
How many Swedish cops does it take to successfully arrest a fit refugee? We're not sure, it's never been done successfully
The whole thing can only be described as.... insane.
Not that I agree with him on 99% of stuff but I do agree with him here:
"So long as we possess a healthy, manly race--and we National Socialist will attend to that--we will form no female mortar battalions and no female sharpshooting corps. For that is not equality of rights, but a diminution of the rights of woman...."
"The so-called granting of equal rights to women, which Marxism demands, in reality does not grant equal rights but constitutes a deprivation of rights, since it draws the woman into an area in which she will necessarily be inferior. It places the woman in situations that cannot strengthen her position--vis a vis both man and society--but only weaken it..."
I love how they chased the guy who was helping them away.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
