Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The over the top biases of the channels has caused these channels to not being seen as journalism and just a bunch of dumb hosts who are the extended arm of Obama and Clinton.
Even with being part of the Obama/ Clinton clan and having so much power, they couldn't win the election.
\e!
so the real issue is you are angry your side's attempts to deflect with bs are not working.
well i say. Ha ha . the trick was good, it worked for a while but is dead.
The left , the center are no longer biting. Trump's crazy train, is finished.
BTW..
why is everyone close to Trump also tied up in Russian money... why do we NOT see that in the rest of the GOP or dem parties?
Why are Trump's buddies full up with Russians, and their money? Why does Trump owe so much to russians.
Is Trump just a money launderer? Or do they him in even more ways?
Is any of this really a surprise? Most people knew that this administration would be nothing but chaos and disorganization from Day One. It's one thing to cut business deals and quite another to govern. These people have no idea what they're doing and think they can run the country like they run their business.
You are MISSING the problem you are trying to deflect on.
YOUR so-called "major" news outlets DO NOT REPORT on it.
Why do you think that is?
Rice's requests to unmask the names of Trump transition officials does not vindicate Trump's own tweets from March 4 in which he accused Obama of illegally tapping Trump Tower. There remains no evidence to support that claim.
But Rice's multiple requests to learn the identities of Trump officials discussed in intelligence reports during the transition period does highlight a longstanding concern for civil liberties advocates about U.S. surveillance programs. The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Nonsense. If there is no foreign intelligence value to be gained then unmasking is a federal felony.
There was stunned silence from the left this morning when Eli Lake's story about Susan Rice broke on Bloomberg this morning. It took a couple hours on social media and Twitter and different comment sections before I began to see their "it's legal so what's the bfd" excuse shaping up.
Now the left is semi-hysterical. On the one hand it's fun to watch...on the other it's a little amazing to realize the Obama administration really DID use America's intelligence services to spy on an opponent's presidential campaign.
Is any of this really a surprise? Most people knew that this administration would be nothing but chaos and disorganization from Day One. It's one thing to cut business deals and quite another to govern. These people have no idea what they're doing and think they can run the country like they run their business.
Apparently, the people that voted for him didn't get the message.
Nonsense. If there is no foreign intelligence value to be gained then unmasking is a federal felony.
But Rice's multiple requests to learn the identities of Trump officials discussed in intelligence reports during the transition period does highlight a longstanding concern for civil liberties advocates about U.S. surveillance programs. The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
But Rice's multiple requests to learn the identities of Trump officials discussed in intelligence reports during the transition period does highlight a longstanding concern for civil liberties advocates about U.S. surveillance programs. The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
They (msm) had to huddle and come up with coordinated spin.
You know they're working hard with the Democrat party heads to put their spin on this. Somehow they have to make the Obama administration's crimes all Trump's fault.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
