Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-06-2017, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Camberville
15,859 posts, read 21,436,084 times
Reputation: 28199

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BellaLind View Post
I'm not looking to have kids, but this is the reality today. Maybe in another time someone could have kids in their early 20s and do well, but that's just not today's reality. A family can't live off one salary anymore so you need child care, people have to save for their own retirement (very few pensions out there), people have to move away from home to find work so they lose the family support network, etc.

Today's reality is if kids become affordable for a couple, it's usually after you have an established career and a decent nest egg. That's usually in one's late 20s to early 30s.
In my dream world, I'd have 5 kids already. If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. I'm 29, and likely won't even be able to consider having kids for a few years. And that's with my boyfriend and I planning on eloping to keep wedding costs null.

You do what you have to do, and for many of us, that means waiting to have kids until we're prepared. If there is so much concern about birth rates, then rally for subsidized daycare and paid parent leave so the middle class can entertain having children at the optimum time. Otherwise, you'll see the wealthy and poor able to have many children, while the middle class has fewer children later.

 
Old 04-06-2017, 12:58 PM
 
73,007 posts, read 62,585,728 times
Reputation: 21918
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
I would rather, if it were to happen, that it happens after I've had time to build savings and make a name for myself in my career which means in their 30s for most people, rather than at 24 or 25 when you are not financially prepared to handle such a blow.

There are no guarantees in life. I grew up in an area where people have kids young and say "G-d provides." They then find themselves in a world of hurt when they have children with special needs that they cannot afford to take care of.
I'm in no position to have children. This is why if I ever date(I'm turning 31 soon and I've been perennially single), I don't want to date a woman with children. I'm not ready yet, so I won't feel comfortable taking on someone else's children. I had personal problems in my 20s, and I've been playing catch-up for the past few years.

Most of my high school graduation class(2004) has kids. There were those that had kids before they graduated high school, those that got married young then had kids, and those who are divorced. Where I went to high school, there are people on their 2nd divorce before turning 30. I don't want to go through a divorce. One reason for being quite picky.

What you mentioned about special needs kids, I only know of one situation like that. And said person has 3 kids.
 
Old 04-06-2017, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,253 posts, read 23,729,935 times
Reputation: 38634
Quote:
Originally Posted by fordtrucks View Post
Does this mean that millennials are a bunch of spoiled brats!!!

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...lling-marriage
How on earth does that make millennials "spoiled brats"?

Look at what millennials saw. I don't have the estimates but I'd bet that a good chunk of them lived in homes where the parents got divorced. Even if they didn't, we all saw a good fat chunk of friends' parents get divorced. Oh yes, let's rush on in to that fun time!

First we tell people not to rush in to it, then we tell them that they're spoiled brats for not rushing in to it.

If people want to take the time to get an education, get a good job, start making some money, go live life before they ever decide to get hitched, have kids, live in the suburban home with the white picket fence where everything looks the same...I applaud that. There's no need to rush in to anything. I'd rather someone do it right than do it wrong and make life miserable for their kids.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
Come on now.
Just say you don't want to get married. The excuses get old. If you have a lousy job isn't it better to have someone else who can help support you, share in the rent and bills and paying taxes. ???? No one forces you into a very long educational career (professional student)...lol. When you get your great job because 22 years of school, then you don't want to get married because too much to lose in a divorce, so you cant be poor and married, and can't be well off and married, oh no....
That is a lousy reason to get married.
 
Old 04-06-2017, 01:54 PM
 
19,621 posts, read 12,218,208 times
Reputation: 26411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post


That is a lousy reason to get married.
No one said being low income is a reason to get married. It isn't reason not to get married if you are inclined to marry your partner. How is pooling two incomes bad...?
 
Old 04-06-2017, 02:22 PM
 
73,007 posts, read 62,585,728 times
Reputation: 21918
Apparently on one of my posts, I was indirectly referred to as "slow" in the reputation comments. Now this is getting crazy.
 
Old 04-06-2017, 02:43 PM
 
Location: Camberville
15,859 posts, read 21,436,084 times
Reputation: 28199
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
No one said being low income is a reason to get married. It isn't reason not to get married if you are inclined to marry your partner. How is pooling two incomes bad...?
Pooling two incomes for living expenses isn't bad. Joining yourself legally to someone's finances (and past financial choices!) is a different situation.
 
Old 04-06-2017, 02:52 PM
 
5,722 posts, read 5,798,945 times
Reputation: 4381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leisesturm View Post
Except for the stubborn refusal to acknowledge that biology does not agree. A 35 year old woman is old. Period. It is not an optimal age to have a child. It is often disastrous to have a 1st child at that age. But in America we hide the overwhelming evidence of misery, and highlight the occasional happy endings.
Nonsense if the woman is healthy there's no problem 99.999 percent of the time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
I'm not a baby boomer , but if younger generations blame everything on the older generation it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy .
You see people doing this in general .
"I didn't go to a good school ... so I can't X"

"I wasn't born into money so I can't X"

Also not cool to call older people "old farts"

Just like it's not right to call younger people "young punks" or "spoiled little brats "

Yes some are but generalizing like that isn't right.
The older generations are out of touch they worked in the 50's through the 70's when the country was totally different. Sadly these are the people running the country and that's why we're in the mess we're in.

Let all these pull up your boot strap preachers try and make it in this day and age...they'll be crying and longing to go back to the 60's and their hippie headband.
 
Old 04-06-2017, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
9,855 posts, read 11,928,784 times
Reputation: 10028
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
In my dream world, I'd have 5 kids already. If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. I'm 29, and likely won't even be able to consider having kids for a few years. And that's with my boyfriend and I planning on eloping to keep wedding costs null.

You do what you have to do, and for many of us, that means waiting to have kids until we're prepared. If there is so much concern about birth rates, then rally for subsidized daycare and paid parent leave so the middle class can entertain having children at the optimum time. Otherwise, you'll see the wealthy and poor able to have many children, while the middle class has fewer children later.
You may not have a 'few years'. You might. But if its that important to you, don't you want better for yourself (and them) than 'might'? The great majority of American children exist because their parents weren't expecting them. In fact many were trying NOT to have them. Sad. Sad that so many who want children leave it till its too late because they want everything to be right financially and that is never going to happen. And so many that didn't want children have them because their knowledge or use of efficient birth control is so inept. I don't know if there are ways to test fertility before the fact, but if there is and I was a 29 y.o. woman, I would at least want to know where I stood. FWIW.
 
Old 04-06-2017, 03:22 PM
 
5,722 posts, read 5,798,945 times
Reputation: 4381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leisesturm View Post
You may not have a 'few years'. You might. But if its that important to you, don't you want better for yourself (and them) than 'might'? The great majority of American children exist because their parents weren't expecting them. In fact many were trying NOT to have them. Sad. Sad that so many who want children leave it till its too late because they want everything to be right financially and that is never going to happen. And so many that didn't want children have them because their knowledge or use of efficient birth control is so inept. I don't know if there are ways to test fertility before the fact, but if there is and I was a 29 y.o. woman, I would at least want to know where I stood. FWIW.
Children are one of the biggest reasons for poverty and people getting on the system. This subsequently leads to relationship problems and stress, if there's even a relationship to begin with. Since being a single mom now w/ no man in the picture has been normalized. You act like the woman is the only factor in the equation. She has to find the man first too, and not just anyone.
 
Old 04-06-2017, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Camberville
15,859 posts, read 21,436,084 times
Reputation: 28199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leisesturm View Post
You may not have a 'few years'. You might. But if its that important to you, don't you want better for yourself (and them) than 'might'? The great majority of American children exist because their parents weren't expecting them. In fact many were trying NOT to have them. Sad. Sad that so many who want children leave it till its too late because they want everything to be right financially and that is never going to happen. And so many that didn't want children have them because their knowledge or use of efficient birth control is so inept. I don't know if there are ways to test fertility before the fact, but if there is and I was a 29 y.o. woman, I would at least want to know where I stood. FWIW.
I learned where I stood when I was told at 23 that it would cost $14,000 to bank my eggs before starting chemo. There's a chance, sure, but it's not particularly reliant on my age at this point. Not to mention the further out from cancer I am, the safer it will be for me to even carry a pregnancy to term. Yes, I know I'm not typical, but everyone lives their own circumstances.

There are many ways to build a family.

I want things to be financially right because daycare for an infant costs $2000 a month where I live. If I was to become accidentally pregnant, I wouldn't be able to afford the daycare costs. It would also be unlikely that I could up and move somewhere cheaper while 4, 6, 8 months pregnant. People figure it out, sure, but both my partner and I had parents who winged it and WE will be paying for that mistake as they age. I won't do that to my kids.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top