Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
MTATech,
You can create just as long of a list of Democratic-Russian connections - much of it as silly as yours.
The fact of the matter is - what proof do you have of Russian-Trump collusion?
On one hand you hypocritically dismiss right wing media - on the other hand you refuse to admit that the DNC's CrowdStrike ran a hit job even though their evidence included an unsubstantiated right wing blog and CrowdStrike themselves are pulling back on their claims and refusing to provide explanations.
You can't see the hypocrisy that you have? You want me to believe an unsubstantiated right wing Russian blogger as 100% true, because the DNC/CrowdStrike told us too...but then you dismiss a right leaning news organization that points out factually CrowdStrike is pulling back on their claims and it was based in part on a right wing Russian blogger?
USE YOUR BRAIN - I often disagree with you - but I always thought you had a brain that you used. Don't be a hypocrite.
The FBI announced two weeks ago that there's been an ongoing investigation of trump russia ties since last summer. Proof of collusion may or may come out of that, but the investigation is in no way over. The FBI recently expanded their team to deal with this.
MTATech,
...
The fact of the matter is - what proof do you have of Russian-Trump collusion?
...
Excellent question! That's exactly why the Congress should be investigating and better yet, should have a special prosecutor. But wait, the Republicans are stonewalling investigations. Why do you think they would do that, huh? A suspicious person would think that they think that there is something to the notion and, since they carry Trump's water, they want everything swept under the carpet.
Any objective person looking at recent Republican actions would see Herculean efforts to investigate Democrats endlessly, with a dozen investigations of Benghazi, and nothing to show for it -- while they hamper the investigation into what could be the worst scandal in U.S. history.
Even if true, which it isn't, (Trump got something like two billion dollars in free publicity -- even MSNBC covered his entire rallies) that wouldn't be illegal. Trump colluding with a foreign power is illegal.
Really, Trump has more connections to Moscow than Aeroflot.
Read this slowly.. No evidence,no connection,no collusion between Trump and Russia.
The Democrats will lose the next 5 elections if they can't prove collusion.
Their rampant and maniacal insistence of collusion has really backed them into a corner.
Prove collusion or.....Trump owns you for life.
Read this slowly.. No evidence,no connection,no collusion between Trump and Russia.
To paraphrase Upton Sinclair, it is difficult to convince a man whose cognitive dissonance depends on him not being convinced.
While you say there is no evidence and no collusion as a matter of facts, the FBI thinks there is enough to investigate. Since I am not privy to what they are discovering, you are premature to assert definitively that there is no evidence,no connection,no collusion between Trump and Russia.
Even if true, which it isn't, (Trump got something like two billion dollars in free publicity -- even MSNBC covered his entire rallies) that wouldn't be illegal.
Trump "used" the media the best he knew how (which as you indicate was pretty well). But Progressives and the DNC have been colluding with the MSM every single freaking day since Trump was nominated.
& they've been doubling down in colluding since his inauguration in an attempt to weaken (& take down) his presidency. The fourth branch of government (the supposedly independent news) is barely a shell of what it once was. NBC, ABC & CBS news & the cable news networks (& Time, the NYT, WaPo etc.) are less relevant to the average citizen than the Politics board on city data or 50 other sources.
An industry that once had Murrow, Severeid and Brinkley are now a bunch of clowns on the take.
Good lord....if Wasserman-Schulz is responsible for this Mega Story being initiated & getting legs, it will flame out at some point.
WoW! Meanwhile Nunez was just removed from the House russia investigation.
Hmmmm.
AP: House intel committee chief Devin Nunes says he's temporarily stepping aside from Russia probe amid ethics accusations.
I think he knows Rice is a gone girl, and he wants to make sure he's not a distraction.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
