Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Don't forget that CrowdStrike refused to testify before congress.
The whole Russian conspircy theory is being exposed for what it is, a complete charade.
Oh geezus Congress can compel their testimony if they have cause, you should be careful about using sites like Daily Mail for a source
If I remember correctly, a few months ago Comey said that the only evidence that connected Russia to wikileaks was a Russian IP address. I think he said that they couldn't confirm whether or not it was an IP address from the Russian government, just that it was from Russia.
So for all we know it could have been the Putin opposition in Russia that hacked Podesta's emails. That's if you believe Comey, which is a big F*****G IF.
The entire Russians Hacked Election was started by the DNC and Clinton campaign. Now that Clinton has lost, the company of "experts" who said it, can't prove it. No doubt they didn't expect to ever be asked.
We need to start seeing LEGAL action for whoever started this fiasco!
The circus environment going on in politics needs to stop.
Crowdstrike is more than suspect. They don't like testing results on a product, sue to have the results from being made public, only to have the suit tossed by the court. Using shills is a favorite Dem tactic, but I won't mention Sandra Fluke, or the attorney Kahn as a couple of high profile examples. That would be tacky. Indeed it would.
Quote:
Crowdstrike sought an injunction in federal court last week and filed a restraining order against NSS Labs to stop the company from publishing test results for Crowdstrike’s endpoint-focused Falcon cybersecurity product line. On Monday, the Delaware-based court denied Crowdstrike’s request, explaining that the plaintiff had failed to demonstrate how NSS Lab’s research would translate into “irreparable harm.”
Those Cybersecurity "Experts" who said last year that Russia Hacked the Election have had to retract what they have said and now they are refusing to cooperate with Congress. No doubt they were expecting Hillary to win.
Also not reported, these "Experts" were hired by none other than Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
But now the first expert company to make a link between the DNC hacks and the Kremlin is facing a damaging series of questions over its credibility, DailyMail.com can disclose.
Cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has had to retract portions of a report supporting its allegations of Russian cyberattacks – and is also refusing to address Congress about its findings on Moscow's election hacking.
Yes they can, but we have yet to see CrowdStrike appear before congress.
Why do you suppose the DNC refused to allow the FBI, or anyone other than CrowdStrike to examine their servers?
Check a source other than Daily Mail or Info Wars and you might find out:
"At the time of publication, the FBI had not yet responded to a request for comment from WIRED about whether it feels that it missed out on higher caliber evidence in investigating the DNC breach or whether it was satisfied with the evidence it collected through other channels. NBC News reporter Ken Dilanian tweeted on Wednesday that a “source close to the investigation says FBI didn’t need the DNC servers because it already had the forensic data from upstream collection.”
The FBI official’s characterization that the DNC “caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier” is somewhat at odds with a report published by the New York Times in mid-December, which indicated that the FBI originally took a “low-key approach” to notifying the DNC about suspicious activity the Bureau had detected on the DNC’s network. In that reported version of the timeline, it wasn’t until seven months after the initial (half-hearted) FBI warning that the DNC was first motivated to defend its network."https://www.wired.com/2017/01/fbi-sa...email-servers/
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Congress can compel their testimony if they have cause, you should be careful about using sites like Daily Mail for a source 
