Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-09-2017, 06:02 AM
 
746 posts, read 1,242,620 times
Reputation: 859

Advertisements

Seems to be the desire of Mainstream media to get us involved in Syria

https://youtu.be/bRoKIWCeRbM
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2017, 06:02 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
The POTUS is alive and functioning 24/7. The Senate is not. The President must be allowed to take military actions as Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution wouldn't have given the POTUS that job unless the framers intended for actions of this type to proceed.
Which really has nothing to do with anything that has went on here. If Syria had sent planes here no one would complain if we shot them down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 06:04 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Constitution clearly calls for congressional approval before President launches into war.

"Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to declare war. The President, meanwhile, derives the power to direct the military after a Congressional declaration of war..."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/war_powers

As Commander in Chief he can respond to an attack. Hence the nuclear football that accompanies him.

However, we were not attacked.

There simply is no Constitutional justification for Trump launching an attack on Syria.
Or Obama's attacks on Syria.......as I've said for years, when people refuse to hold one president accountable for something they can't expect others to be any different.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 06:09 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,857,695 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Constitution clearly calls for congressional approval before President launches into war.

"Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to declare war. The President, meanwhile, derives the power to direct the military after a Congressional declaration of war..."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/war_powers

As Commander in Chief he can respond to an attack. Hence the nuclear football that accompanies him.

However, we were not attacked.

There simply is no Constitutional justification for Trump launching an attack on Syria.
Please stop making a fool of yourself, every president as far back as Eisenhower launched some type of attack without congressional approval, Including your beloved hero Obama.
https://theintercept.com/2017/01/30/...ar-old-sister/
I don't recall congress declaring war on Yemen.

While I do not approve of Pres. Trumps actions in Syria, as Com. in Chief he has the authority to do it.

RR
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 06:12 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,945,761 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Or Obama's attacks on Syria.......as I've said for years, when people refuse to hold one president accountable for something they can't expect others to be any different.
That's a true but naive view that ignores the hypocrisy factor. An action by Obama, which Republicans state needs prior Congressional action doesn't need said approval when Trump is president. It's in the same section of the constitution labeled, "nominating while black," that says that a black president's nominees can be held up for his whole term while a white president gets his sailed through.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 06:15 AM
 
26,490 posts, read 15,066,580 times
Reputation: 14638
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
Jail Donald Trump‏
@DTrumpExposed
Food for Thought: If Hillary was President & ordered the Syria strikes how many who are praising Trump now, would have been condemning it?

Angela‏ @crosswordpuzzlr 4h4 hours ago
Replying to @DTrumpExposed
If Hilary had done this, they wouldn't be using the runway the next day.

https://twitter.com/DTrumpExposed/st...45966924222464
Wait - you cant see that Democrats are being hypocrites here too?

Obama used the military to strike multiple times without consent from congress.

Ironically, Candidate Obama himself said it would be illegal to strike a country without congressional approval. President Obama didn't care much.

Do you honestly care that a president does it - or do you just care that Trump did it?


Also, Obama made a record amount of small limited strikes - could you please share a link to you complaining about it - or were you accepting of it, because Obama is hawt?


P.S. Can you share with me a link where you are upset about Obama continually arming ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, etc....who are using Obama-weapons to kills Jews, Gays, Christians, Atheists, secularists, etc...Thanks Obama!!! Something tells me that you wouldn't tolerate Trump being that blundering.

P.P.S. I oppose Trump's strike.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 06:18 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadrat View Post
Please stop making a fool of yourself, every president as far back as Eisenhower launched some type of attack without congressional approval, Including your beloved hero Obama.
https://theintercept.com/2017/01/30/...ar-old-sister/
I don't recall congress declaring war on Yemen.

While I do not approve of Pres. Trumps actions in Syria, as Com. in Chief he has the authority to do it.

RR
There was no national interest to bomb Syria. Trump and the presidents before him did not have the authority, we just refuse to hold them accountable for their actions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 06:19 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,857,695 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
That's a true but naive view that ignores the hypocrisy factor. An action by Obama, which Republicans state needs prior Congressional action doesn't need said approval when Trump is president. It's in the same section of the constitution labeled, "nominating while black," that says that a black president's nominees can be held up for his whole term while a white president gets his sailed through.
How do you know when Libre-tards are loosing a debate?

They vere off subject and throw out the racist card.

I guess you didn't get the memo, the race card is tired, worn out, and doesn't work anymore.

RR
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 06:19 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,851,724 times
Reputation: 4585
The Syria airstrike was a "uuuuge" success... Trump was able to keep it shut for a couple hours. Took that long to get another gas truck there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 06:20 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
That's a true but naive view that ignores the hypocrisy factor. An action by Obama, which Republicans state needs prior Congressional action doesn't need said approval when Trump is president. It's in the same section of the constitution labeled, "nominating while black," that says that a black president's nominees can be held up for his whole term while a white president gets his sailed through.
I am neither naive or hypocritical. I condemned Obama also. I am condemning Trump. I am simply pointing out why presidents can do whatever damn well they please. For others, yes the hypocrisy runs deep on both sides.

If you didn't condemn Obama's actions you have no leg to stand on to condemn Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top