Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-11-2017, 10:58 AM
 
29,513 posts, read 22,641,616 times
Reputation: 48231

Advertisements

Here we go

United Airlines Cites Wrong Rule For Illegally De-Boarding Passenger | Law News

I'm glad to see the general public rallying against United.

Unlike some people on CD, most people realize that this isn't a case of an entitled passenger demanding to be boarded first or being disruptive because they can't hog the overhead bin space.

United can't even get their own rules straight. They trampled over a paying customer and screwed it all up.

Screw them and their inept CEO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2017, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Eugene, Oregon
11,119 posts, read 5,587,588 times
Reputation: 16596
Textbooks about mass delusions will need to have new chapters added, about this administration and the flocks of sheep that follow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2017, 10:58 AM
 
833 posts, read 520,605 times
Reputation: 641
So, at a minimum, the public narrative thus far might be disrupted. The question now becomes, who was he going to see? Patients, as alleged, or doing other things? While it has nothing to do with the way he was removed, it does sort of cast doubt on his legitimacy as a doctor and the narrative that he needed to go see patients as additional reasoning for us to feel sorry for him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2017, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,786,069 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
I did not see anywhere in your linked article that UA 'said' that.

Is this why he was pulled off the flight? If not, then I don't see the connection or how it changes any of the facts regarding how he was treated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bettafish View Post
This is called smearing campaign, a commonly used strategy in damage control.
Exactly right! What does something the guy did more than a decade ago have to do with how he was treated on his PAID flight?

Airlines are getting full of themselves again. UAL stock is down 5% since and over 2% today. They'll be paying this man a nifty 6-7 figure OoCS, GUARANTEED! Hope those 4 seats were worth it. The men who dragged the guy off the plane should be fired and brought up on misdemeanor assault/battery charges.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
This man is set for life. I predict he will get a lot of money from the airline. Gay or not, doctor or not.
Agreed, as you can see above. The fact that he is a doctor will have teams of lawyers salivating to represent him. If he were just a Joe the Plumber, probably not so much, though it would still be a huge settlement. People with money attract money, people who need money... not so much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2017, 11:01 AM
 
19,626 posts, read 12,218,208 times
Reputation: 26427
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
By not complying with the wishes of the private property owners that requested him to leave their property.
Not even just that, the screaming like a toddler when the inevitable happened and he got pulled out of his seat. He had ample opportunity to get up on his own. He could have gotten up when he saw security coming to get him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2017, 11:02 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,000 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13698
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
By not complying with the wishes of the private property owners that requested him to leave their property.
IF the passenger had not already paid for a service/product (in this case, the flight), I agree, as in the case of those who refuse to serve MAGA-wearing hat patrons, or bake a wedding cake for a same sex wedding before payment for such was already rendered. BUT this passenger had already paid for the flight. That changes everything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2017, 11:03 AM
 
19,626 posts, read 12,218,208 times
Reputation: 26427
Quote:
Originally Posted by man4857 View Post
Good, hope it goes lower. They need to learn their lesson from being so tone-deaf and not siding with a paying customer.
Temporary. Last week it was girls in leggings.
If they sell cheap tickets people will buy them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2017, 11:03 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,611,558 times
Reputation: 18521
United Airways Lawyers digging dirt to smear his cred, in litigation.
Now you know why Progressives in both parties, pushed the Patriot Act and NDAA.
To dig dirt on Americans. Susan Rice proved that.


I got the dirt on you. You better do what I say, or else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2017, 11:03 AM
 
5,213 posts, read 3,012,647 times
Reputation: 7022
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
By not complying with the wishes of the private property owners that requested him to leave their property.


And by him paying for the ticket and not receiving the services that UA was suppose to provide, id say that it is up to them to accommodate him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2017, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,597,926 times
Reputation: 7801
Nevermind all of that, I still think it's weird how this doctor was screaming like some kid. He should have acted like an adult and leave as requested. Deal with UA in the courts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top