Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I know.. I was AGREEING with you.. guess I forgot to say that explicitly enough! Sorry 'bout that!!
The rest of my post there was attempting to point out the differences of multi party government and a 2 part with multi-factions "Within" one of the 2. Because the multiparty group can and do band together which would out number by percentage than the leader does. 2 Party system .. gridlock happens and done's in the 2 party system.
The kids i referred to were the college kids. The voters Trump pulled were established Rs, but he pulled in many who had given up on the political system years ago.
Hillary kept her crowds small and practically hand picked. She gets nervous around big crowds. Candidate enthusiasm can be generated by means other than big crowds.
Oh. bull ****.
Quote:
Have you ever work in a political campaign, local state or POTUS?
Why do all Democrats have to march in lockstep? That's darn near impossible. If Republicans can live with their warring factions, so should we be able to as well.
Not everyone is in love with Bernie; some are. So what?
Why do all Democrats have to march in lockstep? That's darn near impossible. If Republicans can live with their warring factions, so should we be able to as well.
Not everyone is in love with Bernie; some are. So what?
That's what primaries are for. No lockstep. Usually everybody gets behind the winner. I can't stand Hillary but I voted for her and the Supreme Court.
Democrats have never been lockstep. In Texas many years ago, the podium at the State convention had barbed wire around it. Or they had to call out the National guard.
But general election time, they were all on the same team.
So what? It is over. You don't like it? Get involved.
You can't stand her . You voted for Stein. How did that work out for you? Or the country?
We have yet to see how that worked out. So far not as good as I hoped as the (D)'s haven't seemed to have learned a thing. In the little picture it doesn't bother me. Hillary or Trump is all the same to me.
I'm talking both. Sanders was extremely popular precisely among the demographics that carried Trump to victory. Have you noticed how Sanders routinely get rooms full of Trump supporters to cheer for him as he tours the country? Rural Vermont is Sanders country. Why? Because rural and working class Americans like straight shooters with integrity. Sanders is a pro-labor New Deal democrat with decades of consistency. You cant fake that.
That's what primaries are for. No lockstep. Usually everybody gets behind the winner. I can't stand Hillary but I voted for her and the Supreme Court.
Democrats have never been lockstep. In Texas many years ago, the podium at the State convention had barbed wire around it. Or they had to call out the National guard.
But general election time, they were all on the same team.
Far from it. Libertarians (right) got more votes than Green (left). You need to move on. Hillary is gone. If she had to rely on the Green Party getting 0.000001% of the vote in the midwestern states, she was a bad candidate. It wasnt freakin' Russia that told Hillary to not campaign in Wisconsin.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sorry 'bout that!! 
