Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-25-2017, 09:02 AM
 
17,338 posts, read 11,262,503 times
Reputation: 40885

Advertisements

Whatever the outcome, the Senate now can't complain and moan they weren't notified. Hope they are happy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-25-2017, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Kind of strange to have 100 senators go to NSA rather than the other way around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2017, 10:39 AM
 
2,451 posts, read 3,212,669 times
Reputation: 4313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
For 100 people? Apparently not. They are meeting in some other building on the WH premises.

I wonder if he's sending school buses to pick up the senators


So "on the premises" is not sufficient?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2017, 10:41 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 23,994,029 times
Reputation: 15559
It's not unusual for the whole Senate to get a briefing -- just unusual to be summoned to The White House for one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2017, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,794 posts, read 40,990,020 times
Reputation: 62169
From yesterday's White House Press Briefing:

"Also on North Korea, on Wednesday, the White House campus will play host to a briefing for all U.S. -- 100 U.S. senators on the subject. The briefers will be Secretary Tillerson and Mattis, Director Coats and General Dunford. This is a Senate briefing convened by the Majority Leader, not a White House briefing. We are just serving as the location. For further questions, I'd direct you to the Majority Leader’s office and the office of the four briefers.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press...cer-4242017-40
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2017, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
It's not unusual for the whole Senate to get a briefing -- just unusual to be summoned to The White House for one.
I think he plans on locking the doors and keeping them there until they agree on the wall and an ACA replacement, the North Korea stuff is just bait.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2017, 10:56 AM
 
Location: On a Long Island in NY
7,800 posts, read 10,102,524 times
Reputation: 7366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Sure looks like Trump wants to start a major war, maybe even nuclear.
^ this

Trump wants to start a war with North Korea to distract from his total lack of ability to govern. This is the MO of an authoritarian leader, look at what Argentina did when their economy crashed in 1982 ... invaded the Falklands. What does Venezuela do everytime they their economy gets worse? They rattle the saber about the Dutch Caribbean islands just offshore. What does Putin do when the Russian economy takes a nosedive? He invades a neighbor.

See a pattern?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2017, 10:59 AM
 
10,513 posts, read 5,161,497 times
Reputation: 14056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Sure looks like Trump wants to start a major war, maybe even nuclear.
Of course Trump doesn't want a nuclear war but he is playing with fire -- recklessly.

He may be laying the groundwork for a conventional preemptive strike to take out North Korea's missile or nuke capability, to set them back, like Israel did to Iran several years ago. Doing a preemptive strike is extremely risky because Kim Jong Un seems unstable and might react by lobbing a nuke at South Korea, perhaps at a military base that has a US presence.

Trump better not be thinking of a ground war. We couldn't win one there in 1950 and we cannot win one there now. North Korea's standing army is huge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2017, 11:00 AM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,632,444 times
Reputation: 7292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I think he plans on locking the doors and keeping them there until they agree on the wall and an ACA replacement, the North Korea stuff is just bait.
reichstag fire comes to mind.


Quote:
Adolf Hitler, who had been sworn in as Chancellor of Germany on 30 January, urged President Paul von Hindenburg to pass an emergency decree to suspend civil liberties and pursue a "ruthless confrontation" with the Communist Party of Germany.[2] After passing the decree, the government instituted mass arrests of communists, including all of the Communist Party parliamentary delegates. With their bitter rival communists gone and their seats empty, the Nazi Party went from being a plurality party to the majority, thus enabling Hitler to consolidate his power.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire
Do i think Trump is planning to burn everyone, no but he may well want to stage an event to tighten his grip on power....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2017, 11:03 AM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,632,444 times
Reputation: 7292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Of course Trump doesn't want a nuclear war but he is playing with fire -- recklessly.

He may be laying the groundwork for a conventional preemptive strike to take out North Korea's missile or nuke capability, to set them back, like Israel did to Iran several years ago. Doing a preemptive strike is extremely risky because Kim Jong Un seems unstable and might react by lobbing a nuke at South Korea, perhaps at a military base that has a US presence.

Trump better not be thinking of a ground war. We couldn't win one there in 1950 and we cannot win one there now. North Korea's standing army is huge.
we could beat them this time, assuming china allows it. But the cost would be insanely high. Far worse than any war the usa has fought since at least wwII but maybe in our history. there is a fair chance NK could hit us with a dirty bomb, or bombs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top