Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL. Sure. facts seem to indicate one of us doesn't.
Net illegal immigration was down under Obama. Thats a fact. Money was spent to make it happen. ALSO a fact.
Even better? Its GLARINGLY obvious you did not read your own link. Seriously, thats how poorly you are arguing here.
some highlights since apparently reading your own link is too darned hard for you:
Quote:
By 2008, the year Obama was elected, MS-13’s footprint had spread to 42 states and Washington, D.C., according to the FBI. Membership estimates were as high as 10,000 and the bureau expected that to increase. In an FBI fact sheet released Tuesday, the agency noted that crackdown efforts in 2009 and 2010 — Obama’s first two years in office — helped push back MS-13’s influence.
Quote:
Obama, who deported an estimated 2.5 million people during his first seven years, announced in November 2014 that his administration was focusing on deporting criminals who’d crossed into the U.S. since that January.
Those criminals would be moved to the top of the priority list, Obama said, according to the Wall Street Journal.
“Felons, not families. Criminals, not children. Gang members, not a mom who’s working hard to provide for her kids,” Obama said. “We’ll prioritize, just like law enforcement does every day.”
I see greywar handed out the information that a quick query to your favorite search engine could have provided.
Nah, that was biscuitmom. I just pointed out that he had not read his own link that he was trying to use.
Thats the problem when you are using google to prove something, and you read just the titles, and not the article. its not a discussion from you, its a knee jerk reaction with no comprehension of the discussion.
Sure you answered with a link, and I answered with another which pointed out the hypocrisy of yours. Sorry it went over your head.
Sorry you didn't read your link (I suggest doing so before embarrassing yourself more here). Its not just net immigration numbers, it was prioritizing criminals over people who work here. It was "getting out the bad hombres" being the focus of the spending, which he increased.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is that your usual m.o: desperate attempt at deflection when given a straight simple answer to your straight simple question?
