Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They make no mention of charging anyone in Obama's administration for unmasking names which was within their normal duties and security clearance.
Ah ha ha ha. Look how far the progs have come since their initial outrage over Trump’s accusations of Obama spying on the Trump campaign. So it's not illegal leaks anymore, eh? It was "within their normal duties and security clearance".
Nothing to see here folks, just business as usual...lol.
It took a year or so before they nailed Nixon. The investigators want to have an airtight case but are being stymied by anti-American politicians and government officials. There used to be a time when treason was called out immediately but with the people Trump has appointed and with the politicians that now run the government, it would be a miracle if they put America before their own interest.
The Nixon comparison. See, that's the biggest lie of all. Why don't you folks come out and admit what's really going on.
Democrats want to wrap up Trump with a special prosecutor for the next two years for a chance to flip the House in 2018. Screw the country, its all power and politics to Democrats.
It took a year or so before they nailed Nixon. The investigators want to have an airtight case but are being stymied by anti-American politicians and government officials. There used to be a time when treason was called out immediately but with the people Trump has appointed and with the politicians that now run the government, it would be a miracle if they put America before their own interest.
There was also a time when people knew what the word Treason meant too.
These past two days Claude Taylor and Louise Mensch have jointly gone from claiming Trump is one of 70 persons and entities to be indicted to claiming Trump is already indicted. Past tense as is already served.
They didn't say Trump has been served with an indictment. What they wrote is that indictments have been "granted" (whatever that means) and that numerous indictment are currently sealed. Neither one of them are lawyers and they freely admit that they may be using the wrong terminology. And they point out, correctly, that Trump cannot be indicted. They claim the indictment against Trump is meant to used as a starting point for the House to begin impeachment proceedings.
What Taylor, Mensch and Bill Palmer do isn't fake news -- they take rumors and unverified anonymous tips and air them out. They also take real news and speculate on what's happening next. It's part news, part rumor and part entertainment. They've been sort of right on some key developments -- missing on some specifics, but generally in the ballpark.
The only reason I have given them a 1 in 100 chance of being right is their recent history. They DO seem to either have gotten amazingly lucky, or they have a real source.
But folks shouldn't let their own wish fulfillment bias's get them believing it without more evidence. A LOT more evidence. Thats how people become birthers and other idiocy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
