Why do "tolerant" left wing thugs violently attack others?

[NCN]

Originally Posted by 2sleepy

verbal attacks on these forums? Could you give us a few examples?

If I could remember the thread where he posted I would show you the post of a person who said he was with the group that was going to continue to disrupt beyond the election. I took it with a grain of salt but what I am seeing makes me wonder if he knew what he was talking about. It sounded like there is a plan to take over the government and if I told you who he said was behind it everybody would know that person.

He wasn't someone saying he knew about the group only. He said he was part of the group being trained. He said we would hear from them. Wish I had written down his name.

[uggabugga]

Originally Posted by jrt1979

The typical response you will get from the right is that liberals are unstable and fueled be their emotions/ liberalism is a mental disorder.

The Typical response you will get from the left is that it's justified, the actions of a few don't represent the whole, or that the right does it too.

The truth is that young people do stupid things and are more violent than older people. Most liberals are young. Add to this that some minority groups (particularly African Americans) disproportionately commit far more crime. Put these groups in a situation to behave badly, and they often will.

Basically, left-wing political ideology in the U.S. is not the reason why the left is associated with violence. It's simply that the people that generally subscribe to it are already more likely to be violent or unreasonable. Give a reason for kids or stupid people to rebel and they will. Nothing more, nothing less

this butt-nugget was 28 years old. far from a 'kid'.

[Clarallel]

Originally Posted by Joe the Photog

You do know that people on all sides of the political spectrum sometimes resorts to violence right? Look no further than Montana for proof. It's wrong to ever resort to violence and folks should shun those that doit, no matter whether they agree with them politically or not

Sorry, but I think that's a false equivalency. It seems to me that if you look at not only violence, but also violent rhetoric, and especially what comes from the politicians themselves - you'll find much more guilt on the part of Republicans.

[Magritte25]

I see this question as one displaying a sincere lack of logical thinking, maturity and life experience. Anyone who possesses the aforementioned traits understands any person from any group can and will be violent. Trying to assign the act of violence to any one group lacks maturity, life experience and logical thinking.

[banjomike]

Originally Posted by southeasttexas

One of the many violent, hate filled attacks committed by left wing thugs, in Berkeley.

Berkeley: Professor used bike lock in beatings, police say

How does one guy become 'thugs'? You're trying to place the actions of one person on the left wing- about 150 million people.

That's a pretty dumb thing to attempt. Try placing 'one of the many' comment where it belongs. It doesn't belong here, that's for sure.

[mkpunk]

Originally Posted by Magritte25

I see this question as one displaying a sincere lack of logical thinking, maturity and life experience. Anyone who possesses the aforementioned traits understands any person from any group can and will be violent. Trying to assign the act of violence to any one group lacks maturity, life experience and logical thinking.

I agree but this is home teaming. I am independent because there isn't many Republicans like me left, Rockefellers. If they are, they don't represent the middle class but rather the donor class.I voted McCain and Romney in 08 and 12 because I believe they had good plans for the middle class, more so than Obama. That said, had Obama had a six year term, I would have voted for him in 14. By 16 I was Kaisach. I couldn't vote Trump because I knew he'd be a Republican Obama just more blatant about kickbacks to the super rich. He hasn't proven me wooing yet...