Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-31-2017, 01:24 PM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,443,819 times
Reputation: 6960

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
No one is saying you can't protest but rather what is an acceptable level of protest such that it does not infringe upon the rights of others.

Consider the Westboro church funeral protesters. Are you ok with them protesting down the road? I am. Are you ok with them coming up to the actual graveside service and screaming at the people with bullhorns? I am not.

I think that in these situations you have to look at it from both sides and look for where the line is between the rights of the protesters and the rights of the people trying to utilize their own rights to free speech.

We have a clear group of posters that are ok with damn near anything as long as it impinges the ability of the OTHER party from being able to use their own free speech and they're the scary ones.
Truth...Good post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2017, 01:27 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
No one is saying you can't protest but rather what is an acceptable level of protest such that it does not infringe upon the rights of others.
There is no such right.

Quote:
Consider the Westboro church funeral protesters. Are you ok with them protesting down the road? I am. Are you ok with them coming up to the actual graveside service and screaming at the people with bullhorns? I am not.
The people were more than capable of handling them without new laws.

People simply kept them away. Colleges have full control over this. They can.eject people. That they CHOOSE not to is NOT a valid reason for stupid politicians to interject themselves.

Quote:
I think that in these situations you have to look at it from both sides and look for where the line is between the rights of the protesters and the rights of the people trying to utilize their own rights to free speech.
There is NO right to not be interrupted. There is no such thing.

Quote:
We have a clear group of posters that are ok with damn near anything as long as it impinges the ability of the OTHER party from being able to use their own free speech and they're the scary ones.
Give your speech in an environment you control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2017, 01:30 PM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,443,819 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
There is no such right.



The people were more than capable of handling them without new laws.

People simply kept them away. Colleges have full control over this. They can.eject people. That they CHOOSE not to is NOT a valid reason for stupid politicians to interject themselves.



There is NO right to not be interrupted. There is no such thing.



Give your speech in an environment you control.
There is also no right to ALLOW this type of behavior. I'm for the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2017, 01:31 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,698 posts, read 34,548,464 times
Reputation: 29286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Lol you're advocating an anti-free speech bill to defend free speech?
seems like your idea of what speech is varies wildly depending on the topic

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Inciting violence is not protected by Free Speech
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
His Freedom of Speech was not violated. The government didn't have any involvement in this issue, and that's the only application of Freedom of Speech mentioned in the Constitution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Freedom of Speech means you are free to express your opinions without persecution from the local, state, or federal government.
so where's the 'persecution from the local, state, or federal government' in this situation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2017, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Eugene, Oregon
11,119 posts, read 5,589,229 times
Reputation: 16596
Every post on this thread has the same theme. Those who are leftists are saying that only they have the right to speak unobstructed and rightists are saying that only they have that right. So one-sided speeches can't be presented and only debates with all sides represented, can take place. Simple solution. Let the right-wingers spout their poisonous drivel and be exposed for what they are, in the face of truth from the other side. Evil withers when light shines on it, so the best policy is to let it be expressed and to self-destruct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2017, 01:51 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
There is also no right to ALLOW this type of behavior. I'm for the law.
The college does not have to allow it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2017, 03:14 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,370,877 times
Reputation: 11375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
No it isn't. Anti-speakers have every right to shout down speakers.
No, they don't, if they're in an area temporarily reserved for the speech of another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2017, 06:02 AM
 
78,409 posts, read 60,579,949 times
Reputation: 49688
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
There is no such right..
If two people have the right to free speech and one of them uses their right to infringe on the others rights then something has to give does it not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2017, 06:04 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
If two people have the right to free speech and one of them uses their right to infringe on the others rights then something has to give does it not?
There is no right to not get interrupted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2017, 06:08 AM
 
421 posts, read 287,999 times
Reputation: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniqueFreak View Post
Actually SHOUTING DOWN speakers is anti free speech....this makes consequences for being a little fascist shouting down people you don't want to hear speak. Its odd for some reason when I don't want to hear someone speak...I turn the channel or just don't attend!

Just for information purpose's they do this in russia ,not in America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top