Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-02-2017, 06:40 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,611,728 times
Reputation: 22232

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtnluver8956 View Post
I'm a climatologist and I don't fly private jets or have a yacht. Maybe stop with the stereotypes?
You need to do a better job of monetizing the fear before it's too late.

I think people are already getting bored with climate change.

If it hadn't been for Trump's action, climate change would be out of style before men's rompers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-02-2017, 06:40 PM
 
Location: The Island of Misfit Toys
2,765 posts, read 2,792,866 times
Reputation: 2366
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Can you give us a definition of "climate scientist"?

I thought so. LOL.

It's all a scam. Just like "economist". They say what politicians want them to say to rook the unsuspecting public who no longer critically thinks for themselves. (this is why they have to google up links in vain attempt to make argument)

The snow on the mountain speaks for itself.


(and it was quite silly to bring up Bush & the debt)
So scientist's cooked up this scam of going all over the planet taking core samples and temperature measurements just so they can make money?

It seems to me scientist's could have thought if an easier way to make money.

And if all these scientist's are just out for money, I'm sure they could make a ton as paid shills debunking their own climate theory for the fossil fuel industry.

Lastly, if you were a scientist who was going to make something up about the climate just to make money, why wouldn't you choose something you knew people wouldn't be able to doubt or challenge at any time?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2017, 06:41 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,360,513 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtnluver8956 View Post
Thank you. CO2 has a positive feedback and that's proven. What is up for debate is whether anthropocentric releases is overpowering the natural cycles. There is a definite correlation to anthropocentric release and the climate that has become evident in the past decade as science has progressed our understanding of the climate. If someone tells you some factoid as MT Kilo will be without snow in a certain year, they are wrong. The true scientists like myself, run models and provide multiple scenarios of what could happen and score our predictions. So far the IPCC models have been right and that lends to their consensus. What everyone should be afraid off is what happens after we cross the temperature threshold. After that Global Warming can not be stopped and the amazon will burn and the ice caps will melt and billions of people will be underwater and droughts, famine, and extreme floods will occur. This is why action is needed now before we get to that point and we condemn our children to a desolate world with no hope.
Al Gore isn't a real scientist?

But he invented the internet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2017, 06:41 PM
 
46,281 posts, read 27,099,738 times
Reputation: 11126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtnluver8956 View Post
I'm a climatologist and I don't fly private jets or have a yacht. Maybe stop with the stereotypes?

So, do you think those that are pro climate change, should fly jets or own yachts, then complain about the carbon foot print?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2017, 06:42 PM
 
3,366 posts, read 1,605,792 times
Reputation: 1652
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
everyone keeps misrepresenting this 95-97% number. you wrongly assume that is it all scientists, and that is false. if you had bothered read the poll, it was 97% of IPCC scientists, not all of them. and sorry but UN scientists are going to be political in this regard and follow what the UN wants them to say.
Agreed. This number is being incorrectly touted.


These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes than to human activities. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles.

Khabibullo Abdusamatov, astrophysicist at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences[74][75]
Sallie Baliunas, retired astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[76][77][78]
Timothy Ball, historical climatologist, and retired professor of geography at the University of Winnipeg[79][80][81]
Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[82][83]
Chris de Freitas, associate professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland[84][85]
David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester[86][87]
Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University[88][89]
William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy; emeritus professor, Princeton University[90][91]
Ole Humlum, professor of geology at the University of Oslo[92][93]
Wibjörn Karlén, professor emeritus of geography and geology at the University of Stockholm.[94][95]
William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology[96][97]
David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware[98][99]
Anthony Lupo, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Missouri[100][101]
Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[102][103]
Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at Carleton University in Canada.[104][105]
Ian Plimer, professor emeritus of mining geology, the University of Adelaide.[106][107]
Arthur B. Robinson, American politician, biochemist and former faculty member at the University of California, San Diego[108][109]
Murry Salby, atmospheric scientist, former professor at Macquarie University and University of Colorado[110][111]
Nicola Scafetta, research scientist in the physics department at Duke University[112][113][114]
Tom Segalstad, geologist; associate professor at University of Oslo[115][116]
Nir Shaviv, professor of physics focusing on astrophysics and climate science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem[117][118]
Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia[119][120][121][122]
Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[123][124]
Roy Spencer, meteorologist; principal research scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville[125][126]
Henrik Svensmark, physicist, Danish National Space Center[127][128]
George H. Taylor, retired director of the Oregon Climate Service at Oregon State University[129][130]
Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from University of Ottawa[131][132]
Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown

These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.

Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.[133][134]
Claude Allègre, French politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at Institute of Geophysics (Paris).[135][136]
Robert Balling, a professor of geography at Arizona State University.[137][138]
PÃ¥l Brekke, solar astrophycisist, senior advisor Norwegian Space Centre.[139][140]
John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to several IPCC reports.[141][142][143]
Petr Chylek, space and remote sensing sciences researcher, Los Alamos National Laboratory.[144][145]
David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma.[146][147]
Stanley B. Goldenberg a meteorologist with NOAA/AOML's Hurricane Research Division [148] [149]
Vincent R. Gray, New Zealand physical chemist with expertise in coal ashes[150][151]
Keith E. Idso, botanist, former adjunct professor of biology at Maricopa County Community College District and the vice president of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change[152][153]
Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists.[154][155]
Kary Mullis, 1993 Nobel Laureate in Chemistry
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2017, 06:43 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 27 days ago)
 
27,646 posts, read 16,133,597 times
Reputation: 19065
The globalists should just stage an alien invasion and be done with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2017, 06:44 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,360,513 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
The globalists should just stage an alien invasion and be done with it.
More organisms to tax and regulate!

They'd love it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2017, 06:46 PM
 
19,718 posts, read 10,124,301 times
Reputation: 13086
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
And in 2001 GW Bush said he would pay off $2 trillion dollars of our national debt in 10 years.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5F79kd2O7U



At least Al Gore has 97% of active climate scientists saying man-made global warming is most likely happening (GW Bush has absolutely nothing backing up his 10 year claim.)

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
You do realize that the 97% figure has been proven fake many times?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2017, 06:47 PM
 
Location: Port Charlotte, FL - Dallas, PA
5,172 posts, read 4,943,999 times
Reputation: 5087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Every day. Every month every year since we have been on the Earth.
Actually, since even before we showed up. It's been changing even before the first slime developed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2017, 06:47 PM
 
212 posts, read 136,083 times
Reputation: 350
Climate change is real and as old as our planet. The liberal interpretation and politicization of climate change, however, is a total scam.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top