Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How far back in time do we have to go before we hit a time when calling a POTUS "a piece of ****" on air was considered unprofessional and a fireable offence? I want that to be a thing again.
How far back in time do we have to go before we hit a time when calling a POTUS "a piece of ****" on air was considered unprofessional and a fireable offence? I want that to be a thing again.
How far back in time do we have to go before we hit a time when calling a POTUS "a piece of ****" on air was considered unprofessional and a fireable offence? I want that to be a thing again.
Of course he's been condemned for his response to this tragedy - and not just in London, but all over the world. The mayor of London asked Londoners to not be alarmed if they see an increased police presence in the city, Trump completely changed the meaning of what the London mayor said. The source of fake news in the USA is the President of the USA.
Trump is using the terrorist act in London as a marketing ploy to further his own agenda rather than expressing condolences to the victims. His actions and words are disgraceful. The USA is losing credibility by the minute, and will increasingly be ignored and by-passed for important international negotiations.
How far back in time do we have to go before we hit a time when calling a POTUS "a piece of ****" on air was considered unprofessional and a fireable offence? I want that to be a thing again.
Need to go back to before the POTUS falsely accused the former President of being a criminal.
And before he claimed that the free press was the "enemy of the people."
Before the POTUS accused Clinton of being "corrupt" and led "Lock her up," cheers.
Probably a good idea to go back to before Trump stated that 2nd Amendment folks should do something about Clinton.
The bar is so low these days, that calling Trump "a piece of ****" seems pretty tame by comparison.
I fear the quaint notion that Presidents and TV reporters should stick to the truth and be respectful of one another has gone by the wayside.
There is no proof the people who committed those crimes were immigrants...
Trump wants to punish all possible immigrants whether there is any proof of terrorist ties or not
That is not anti-terror---that is anti-Muslim, racist behavior
And he is piggybacking his agenda on the pain the Brits suffered...
That is the truth...
This event was yet another added to the pile of evidence showing the urgency of implementation of the ban. Once again, the President demonstrated his clear understanding of what we elected him to do.
Now is the time for ACTION, not more PC bulls**t.
It was a tempory ban for 120 days to look into the vetting. What has he come up with? My guess is nothing. Was he just BS'ing again????
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
