Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 06-06-2017, 07:33 AM
 
2,049 posts, read 1,057,977 times
Reputation: 206

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Excuses. The towers were targeted on 9-11 because they represent the financial system that is benefiting from these wars. So most of the dead were collateral damage because the money men were hiding among the people in the tower.

We have NO business targeting anyone over there. What exactly are we accomplishing besides killing thousands of people that have done nothing to us?
The West participates in wars on behalf of Muslims in some cases
He wants to preserve oil resources
And maintaining prosperity for Americans as well as Europeans
and I tell you
America has sent troops to protect Muslims in Bosnia
America has sent troops to protect Muslims in Africa

America has sent its forces to liberate Kuwait
America also sent its troops to destroy Iraq in 2003 and it was Saudi Arabia that requested it
So the participation of your forces in wars is to protect your interests and also to protect the systems that cooperate with you
Thus, these wars are not aggressive and not against Islam
It's a war of interests
The World Trade Center was a symbol of the capitalist system
Therefore, the strike was symbolic and opening to the era of the beginning of the Islamic invasions of the West
This was your message
I hope that your emotions will not push you and lose your well-being because of terrorism
If the fighter is hiding among the women
He is guided by a gun on your chest what you will do
This is the picture of the battles between the Islamic state organizations in Iraq and Syria
Muslim fighters are hiding among civilians
That is why civilians are falling
Shouting to gain sympathy from their Muslim brethren and even justify their terrorism against democratic states
It is a conflict between the civilization of the West
And the darkness of Islam

 
Old 06-06-2017, 07:39 AM
 
79,906 posts, read 43,920,461 times
Reputation: 17189
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahasn sawresho View Post
The West participates in wars on behalf of Muslims in some cases
He wants to preserve oil resources
And maintaining prosperity for Americans as well as Europeans
and I tell you
America has sent troops to protect Muslims in Bosnia
America has sent troops to protect Muslims in Africa
No. Sometimes we protect Muslims when it is in our financial interest to do so. Not for any other reason.

Quote:
America has sent its forces to liberate Kuwait
America also sent its troops to destroy Iraq in 2003 and it was Saudi Arabia that requested it
So the participation of your forces in wars is to protect your interests and also to protect the systems that cooperate with you
Thus, these wars are not aggressive and not against Islam
It's a war of interests
The World Trade Center was a symbol of the capitalist system
Therefore, the strike was symbolic and opening to the era of the beginning of the Islamic invasions of the West
This was your message
I hope that your emotions will not push you and lose your well-being because of terrorism
If the fighter is hiding among the women
He is guided by a gun on your chest what you will do
This is the picture of the battles between the Islamic state organizations in Iraq and Syria
Muslim fighters are hiding among civilians
That is why civilians are falling
Shouting to gain sympathy from their Muslim brethren and even justify their terrorism against democratic states
It is a conflict between the civilization of the West
And the darkness of Islam
These "terrorists" are having dinner with their families when we drop the bombs on them.

The British called us "terrorists" because we fought in a different manner than they did but they never considered killing George Washington's entire family.
 
Old 06-06-2017, 07:39 AM
 
2,842 posts, read 2,317,409 times
Reputation: 3386
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
U.S.-led airstrikes kill 43 civilians in Syria's Raqqa: state TV

DAMASCUS, June 3 (Xinhua) -- U.S.-led airstrikes targeted a residential building in Syria's northern city of Raqqa, killing 43 civilians, state TV reported on Saturday.

The airstrikes targeted the al-Jamili building in Raqqa, said the TV, adding that most of those killed were women and children.


U.S.-led airstrikes kill 43 civilians in Syria's Raqqa: state TV - Xinhua | English.news.cn

It's only a matter of time before they retaliate.
The Nazis used civilians as human shields too. By your logic I guess we should have just left them alone as well.
 
Old 06-06-2017, 07:41 AM
 
79,906 posts, read 43,920,461 times
Reputation: 17189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spot View Post
The Nazis used civilians as human shields too. By your logic I guess we should have just left them alone as well.
One persons human shield is another persons wife, son and daughter. Why are we there?
 
Old 06-06-2017, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,452 posts, read 4,716,285 times
Reputation: 15354
Gee if we're bombing their neighborhoods maybe we should stop inviting them into the country so they can more easily get their revenge.


So many reasons not to let them in, no rational reasons to let them in, yet we insist on letting them in in ever increasing numbers. Logic does not compute.
 
Old 06-06-2017, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
38,981 posts, read 27,367,691 times
Reputation: 15924
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Bully View Post
Gee if we're bombing their neighborhoods maybe we should stop inviting them into the country so they can more easily get their revenge.


So many reasons not to let them in, no rational reasons to let them in, yet we insist on letting them in in ever increasing numbers. Logic does not compute.
Exactly. Some will never agree with you though.
 
Old 06-06-2017, 07:55 AM
 
79,906 posts, read 43,920,461 times
Reputation: 17189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Bully View Post
Gee if we're bombing their neighborhoods maybe we should stop inviting them into the country so they can more easily get their revenge.
If we quit destroying their cities, killing their wage earners, there will be far fewer looking to go somewhere else.

Quote:
So many reasons not to let them in, no rational reasons to let them in, yet we insist on letting them in in ever increasing numbers. Logic does not compute.
None of it does.
 
Old 06-06-2017, 07:57 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
38,981 posts, read 27,367,691 times
Reputation: 15924
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
If we quit destroying their cities, killing their wage earners, there will be far fewer looking to go somewhere else.

I doubt it. Western world is always attractive to third world countries. It is just a fact.

we need to make our country less attractive to them. (this is another topic.)

Gold Mountain is a commonly used nickname for San Francisco, California.

In nineteenth century, there is gold rush, and many chinese went to San Francisco to seek better life and become rich. the Melbourne in Australia is the next “gold mountain”. Many Chinese took the term literally.

Once the Chinese immigrants arrived in California, they found that the gold mountain was an illusion.
 
Old 06-06-2017, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,452 posts, read 4,716,285 times
Reputation: 15354
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
If we quit destroying their cities, killing their wage earners, there will be far fewer looking to go somewhere else.



That's not an argument for letting more of them in.
 
Old 06-06-2017, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,808 posts, read 14,872,678 times
Reputation: 16471
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
U.S.-led airstrikes kill 43 civilians in Syria's Raqqa: state TV

DAMASCUS, June 3 (Xinhua) -- U.S.-led airstrikes targeted a residential building in Syria's northern city of Raqqa, killing 43 civilians, state TV reported on Saturday.

The airstrikes targeted the al-Jamili building in Raqqa, said the TV, adding that most of those killed were women and children.


U.S.-led airstrikes kill 43 civilians in Syria's Raqqa: state TV - Xinhua | English.news.cn

It's only a matter of time before they retaliate.
By terrorists I can assume you are talking about American forces? We are the terrorists, right?

Collateral damage occurs in war all you have to do is ask the residents of Dresden and Berlin during World War II.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top