Democrats took a huge blow on their Russia narrative today (Congress, legal)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And, of course, you seem to be ignoring that part where, even tho trump wasn't currently a target of the investigation, comey felt he couldn't publicly state that trump wasn't under investigation - because he could be in the future, depending on what the investigation of his buddies turned up.
And, of course, you seem to be ignoring that part where, even tho trump wasn't currently a target of the investigation, comey felt he couldn't publicly state that trump wasn't under investigation - because he could be in the future, depending on what the investigation of his buddies turned up.
Is this the same Clapper that testified that he saw no evidence of Trump collusion with the Russians?
Theres a difference between "no" and "no evidence"
Kinda weird watching the narratives of all of this spin out. Republicans and Democrats have both claimed that it looks like a huge win for them. They're both kind of right. It wasn't as bad as Republicans feared, but Democrats got some stuff out of it too.
[quote=dashrendar4454;48427972]looks like Comey confirmed Trump was not under investigation and he did not obstruct anything
liberals hitched their entire wagon to the idea that Trump will be impeached thanks to him colluding with Russia or breaking the law and that dream is now fading away
Liberals failed again! Will they even be able to survive after this Russia thing? It is all they talk about and anything that goes against it is a major embarrassment to them
[
You must have the skills of this guy:
These proceedings have just begun, and already you know the outcome. Carnac would be proud.
IMO the only 'win' is when the truth is fully determined. No matter what side you're on, you should want to know the truth even if the truth is not favorable to your side. And if you're a Trump supporter and he pulled his own version of a 'Nixon,' you should want to know that too and you should accept it if that's the truth.
....and proof that Trump asked for a loyalty pledge, and that he asked that the investigation of Flynn be stopped despite Flynns obvious criminal actions in taking unreported money from Russia, and not registering as a foreign agent (which he did retroactively)
Truth? ... Approaching a year of investigations with nothing regarding collusion.
Truth? ... Liberal news networks win big with no real resolutions to anything, as they will continue telling and selling their narrative.
Usually investigations occur after a crime has been committed. Someone is murdered. There is a theft.
What is the illegality, that is concrete, which prompts this investigation?
Right, we better get another Benghazi hearing going. I also don't think all the facts are in on the email sever deal. Is Vince Foater still dead? Better look into that.
LOL
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.