Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He's just not photogenic. A good picture of him is a bad picture.
Has nothing to do with his policies, his behavior or anything.....
You take the prettiest model and have the cameras shooting her 24/7 and then have a team of editors look for her worst shots - you are going to find plenty. Now just think if you were a competitor or on the opposite side of any issue; are you going to put your opponent's best foot forward? You don't have to be another Great Kreskin to know that our major media hates our President. He might not be one of our Country's top models; but, if the media liked him, I am sure they would find plenty of 'Presidential' shots.
You take the prettiest model and have the cameras shooting her 24/7 and then have a team of editors look for her worst shots - you are going to find plenty. Now just think if you were a competitor or on the opposite side of any issue; are you going to put your opponent's best foot forward? You don't have to be another Great Kreskin to know that our major media hates our President. He might not be one of our Country's top models; but, if the media liked him, I am sure they would find plenty of 'Presidential' shots.
But by the same token, without photo manipulation, a homely person is going to look homely no matter how many shots you take.
Perhaps cons should get their heads out of their azz and acknowledge Trump and/or his associates worked with Russians to influence an American election.
Hush snowflakes, this story ain't going away until it all comes out.
trumps admin did not ''work with ' the Russians to influence the election
Russia, china, both Koreas, india, Saudi, Israel, Germany or any other country of influence is always going to try to guide an election (for any other powerful or useful) of other countries...to include the USA
Obama/Clintons worked with the Russians for the iran deal, and the buying of our uranium...for which the Clintons got paid very well
we (the usa) influenced the Ukraine elections helping to install the Nazi sympathizers... then when the majority Russian population of Crimea VOTED themselves away from Ukraine, we said "oh bad Russians stealing a country "
the dnc/Hillary was NOT hacked, the leaker was a DNC insider who was a bernie supporter, meanwhile, you guys are so worried about a non-hack, but not worried about how the DNC and Hillary CONSPIRED to keep the primary away from any but Hillary (to include biden)
so let us allow this investigation to go its course...but you might find out that Obama/Hillary/dnc will come out of it in worse shape than trump....
I notice CNN and the fake news media do this. This goes beyond just being biased as they are attempting to influence people subconsciously. Is this fair journalism?
Nothing in life is fair.....Certainly Not News (CNN) and all of the Fake Stream Media are completely biased against any Republican.
You take the prettiest model and have the cameras shooting her 24/7 and then have a team of editors look for her worst shots - you are going to find plenty. Now just think if you were a competitor or on the opposite side of any issue; are you going to put your opponent's best foot forward? You don't have to be another Great Kreskin to know that our major media hates our President. He might not be one of our Country's top models; but, if the media liked him, I am sure they would find plenty of 'Presidential' shots.
Sure, if Trump acted "Presidential" instead of making faces like a mime who's trying to express his feelings, then maybe the news networks could get a good picture. Unfortunately, he's usually either making a "pouty" face, duck lips, sneering/grinning (it's hard to tell which with Trump), or just squinching up his face in general. All of those do NOT contribute to a "Presidential" look. Add to that the ducktail comb-over and the weird orange shade of his skin, and there's just not that much going for his appearance.
You have to keep in mind who their audience is, and you'll realize this is the kind of thing that appeals to those that, frankly, are the type that find juvenile humor appropriate. How many juvenile names do the liberals come up with? I think those that frequent those media outlets for their "news" are just a certain type of person, can't you see them, parked on the sofa in their underwear, soda flying out of their noses and chips shooting out of their mouths as they laugh at the "cartoons" provided to them to keep them tuning in?
The content fits the audience. "Fair", they know nothing about "fair".
What is that word that the trumpissts keep saying? Oh, I remember... "butthurt. Yep, sounds pretty butthurt.
The sound of a jealous person who voted for a lying loser!
So, personal attack aside... per the topic of this thread - did you ever locate a recent photo of trump that showed him as looking any different than any photo of him on any news site? Wanna post it to prove your point?
Wow! I read this and all I hear is "HATE, HATE, HATE". For whatever you, or anybody for that matter, to hate someone based on looks is extremely petty.
I don't "hate" him for how he looks. He is an old guy, who seems to have a naturally sour looking face, and who walks like an old guy. It is his behavior, history, and things like lack of self control that make me wish the heck this country had never elected him. But, no, it isn't his looks, despite what you want to think.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.