Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No hypocricy there. Difference is that dems tend to be for a LOT of laws, a whole massive mess of a web of laws. Some of which are unneeded laws, or poorly thought out, or not properly enforced. Conservatives believe in far less laws, but that the laws that DO exist better be good ones, that are fully enforced.
You need to stop watching Faux Fake News and listening to the addict you are incorrect, the GOP wants MORE laws to control a person's life.
Private companies can provide for such information and action, you don't need government to achieve protection in this.
You ever hear of the Underwriters Laboratories and American National Standards Institute? These are private organizations that seek standards and quality certifications. They exist outside of government and yet they exist to protect the consumer.
You do realize government does nothing that private can not do, and do better?
UL and ANSI are basically industrial consortium groups. They provide a very useful rule but would never get near even attempting to discover that lead paint was damaging children or cigarettes causing cancer. They deal with knowable immediately recognizable hazards but the long term effect of things is not in their charter. And they do not always require the best approach. The UL and the US requirement for wiring of homes is well inferior to that of Europe. Cheaper but less safe. That was the choice made by the industry not the consumer. We have done a good bit of fixing with things like GFI...but that is because we started with the wrong system.
And actually the government can simply pay for what it wants from private enterprise. But you cannot let private enterprise define the specification when it comes to safety and the environment. Their conflict is apparent and not resolvable. They are a creature to make profit which may well be in conflict with make it safe.
Your post indicates a lack of understanding of this stuff.
Rat poison is known to be a hazard and one who abuses it is easily brought to court.
Lead paint (a real example) is not known to be harmful and in fact is defended strongly by its manufacturers. How does your libertrian system prevent damage to millions of kids. In fact how does it prevent the damage from going on foreverd?
Similar with Tobacco and cigarettes. Who is it that finds the hazard and establishes the scientific basis to take it to court?
Or perhaps you believe in judicial tooth fairiies?
The one that abuses their due diligence to make sure they are not causing harm to others..... Because if they are caught harming on purpose and blatant, Gone..... Hang them.
The one that abuses their due diligence to make sure they are not causing harm to others..... Because if they are caught harming on purpose and blatant, Gone..... Hang them.
More absurdity. They are dead before the question is answered. So who undoes 10 or 12 trillion dollars in damage.
With massive oversight, it still happens.... False sense of security.
So because it happens anyway, we should remove the protection laws? What kind of democracy is that? The fact is those laws have indeed reduced the likelihood of it. The lead was a problem mainly because of it coming from a foreign land (in that case China.)
So because it happens anyway, we should remove the protection laws? What kind of democracy is that? The fact is those laws have indeed reduced the likelihood of it. The lead was a problem mainly because of it coming from a foreign land (in that case China.)
Democratic regimes have the right to protect their laws and to prevent any law or law that contradicts its provisions
This filter is the safety valve to protect democracy in free countries
Seems the Communist Democrats want a law for every aspect of your life, from cradle to grave. Bye-Bye Liberty
While we have see Trump push to drop all the laws and regulations that stifle production and prosperity.
Perfect example used by Trump: The Empire State Building was built in less than 1 year. Today, that project would be tied in years of red tape, before any ground is broken and once the first grain of dirt or sand is moved, take years to complete.
Communism and Islam = control and enslavement
Constitution = Freedom & Liberties.
Totally "DIFFERENT ERA"... over many decades and many contrivances BY Man, is what drives the necessity of Regulations being modified and imposed, and further backed by laws, to address the grossness of some men in their quest of and for money. Trump seems in ways to not understand the distinction of the power of money vs the power of wealth. They are discerningly different even though they have some common characteristic in that currency is their common tool.
Seems the Communist Democrats want a law for every aspect of your life, from cradle to grave. Bye-Bye Liberty
While we have see Trump push to drop all the laws and regulations that stifle production and prosperity.
Perfect example used by Trump: The Empire State Building was built in less than 1 year. Today, that project would be tied in years of red tape, before any ground is broken and once the first grain of dirt or sand is moved, take years to complete.
s.
cool story bro, of at least 5 people DIED building it, maybe that is why it takes longer today, but of course maybe you think it is OK for 5 hard working Americans to die so that the "trumps" of the world can get their buildings faster.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.