Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You should write your congressman or get yourself a "wayback" machine.
Or at least a current calendar.
See, there was a GOP majority in Congress at that time and...wait for it...nothing!
Wait a minute.
We have as much evidence of Obama committing obstruction of justice as Trump.
If this is truly about principles then why didn't (1) Democrats scream obstruction of justice over Obama and (2) why won't they now?
Statue of limitations isn't knocking this down - so you can't whine about calendar year as a deflection to protect your party over country.
If you are principled, will you support obstruction of justice investigations just the same for Obama?
Republicans were smart enough to know when Obama was doing the very same things that (1) obstruction of justice is very hard to prove and (2) every democrat would scream racist if they did.
If you want to lower the bar on obstruction of justice, then what is fair is that bar is lowered for Obama too - no?
What do you call an investigation that was begun without a shred of evidence of any crime, that after many months has still not found any evidence of a crime, but then hires more lawyers to dig deeper, hoping to find evidence of a crime, and all the lawyers thus far hired are working for people who want you convicted and removed from office? I call that a "witch hunt."
When an investigation hires more resources to dig deeper that's a witch hunt? That statement seems counterintuitive to me
It is really good of Trump to keep tweeting. The investigation has somewhat gone quiet with Mueller. Trump's continued tweets keep it front and center in the news reminding everyone that it goes on. TWEET TRUMP TWEET!
And most of the people on this board still worship him. Truly mind boggling that they live in entirely different reality.
Isn't it though?
In what universe is it okay to break the law because you accuse somebody else of breaking the law too? You couldn't talk your way out of a speeding ticket with the line of "reasoning."
We have as much evidence of Obama committing obstruction of justice as Trump.
If this is truly about principles then why didn't (1) Democrats scream obstruction of justice over Obama and (2) why won't they now?
Statue of limitations isn't knocking this down - so you can't whine about calendar year as a deflection to protect your party over country.
If you are principled, will you support obstruction of justice investigations just the same for Obama?
Republicans were smart enough to know when Obama was doing the very same things that (1) obstruction of justice is very hard to prove and (2) every democrat would scream racist if they did.
If you want to lower the bar on obstruction of justice, then what is fair is that bar is lowered for Obama too - no?
Same old, same old....Criticize Trump and the cultists reply every time with "But Obama, Hillary or some other democrat" This indicates that even they cannot defend their glorious leader. Trump, if he were innocent of wrong doing would be encouraging these investigations, not trying to obstruct them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
