Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-05-2017, 09:28 AM
 
45,523 posts, read 27,133,570 times
Reputation: 23845

Advertisements

Responding to whistleblower’s claims, Duke admits research data falsification

In-house investigators at Duke University believe a former lab tech falsified or fabricated data that went into 29 medical research reports, lawyers for the university say in their answer to a federal whistleblower lawsuit against it.

Duke’s admissions concern the work of Erin Potts-Kant, and a probe it began in 2013 when she was implicated in an otherwise-unrelated embezzlement. The lawsuit, from former lab analyst Joseph Thomas, contends Duke and some of its professors used the phony data to fraudulently obtain federal research grants.

...
The committee reviewed at least 36 research reports, and in many cases found that she’d tinkered with data before sending it along other investigators. In a few, she simply made things up, Duke said.


Duke, UNC, and NC State received EPA grants over $100 million to each school based on this bogus information.

These are the experts that people quote for information and policy purposes. I know they are all not dishonest, but some of them are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-05-2017, 09:36 AM
 
7,800 posts, read 4,395,332 times
Reputation: 9438
Sounds like Duke admitted parts of the complaint but denied other parts. Either way it is not good and they should be punished if they did abuse taxpayer money.

The Whistleblower will receive a hefty fee if $100 million was the amount that was abused or wasted. I am not condemning that and think this was the type of activity the law was created to prevent.

I just don't like Universities being the centers of storms like this, but they should be held accountable for any abuse of funds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2017, 09:37 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,150,874 times
Reputation: 17209
Isn't this stuff supposed to be "peer reviewed"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2017, 09:38 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,002 posts, read 12,578,437 times
Reputation: 8916
Silly question. What was the topic of the research?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2017, 09:39 AM
 
45,523 posts, read 27,133,570 times
Reputation: 23845
Quote:
Originally Posted by TreeBeard View Post
Sounds like Duke admitted parts of the complaint but denied other parts. Either way it is not good and they should be punished if they did abuse taxpayer money.

The Whistleblower will receive a hefty fee if $100 million was the amount that was abused or wasted. I am not condemning that and think this was the type of activity the law was created to prevent.

I just like Universities being the centers of storms like this, but they should be held accountable for any abuse of funds.
The issue now is if Duke purposely covered it up. I can't image them openly revealing false data and still getting EPA money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2017, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,832 posts, read 14,924,206 times
Reputation: 16578
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Isn't this stuff supposed to be "peer reviewed"?
When it comes to the scam of global warming you have one bunch of Thieves and Crooks reviewing the work of another group of Thieves and Crooks.

These so-called scientists are the lowest form of of crawling animal there is. They are never to be trusted and never believed. Well, idiot you can believe them but it takes an idiot to swallow their swill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2017, 10:25 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,150,874 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
When it comes to the scam of global warming you have one bunch of Thieves and Crooks reviewing the work of another group of Thieves and Crooks.

These so-called scientists are the lowest form of of crawling animal there is. They are never to be trusted and never believed. Well, idiot you can believe them but it takes an idiot to swallow their swill.
Seems it is not relegated to only Global Warming?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top