Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What if males who WANTED the child were allowed (legally) to force the female to go to term, when she wanted to terminate?
There'd be a massive hue and cry, feminists would go insane if this were so.
Neither sex should have the right to force parenthood upon the other. Neither.
Or conversely, and more fairly, BOTH sexes given the right to force parenthood on the other if one allows forcing to happen at all.
If a female chooses to bear the child the male should be exempted if he did not consent to the possibility of pregnancy prior to the sexual act.
Males are beholden to USE birth control/get vasectomies if they want to avoid fatherhood, and they SHOULD; trusting the female who "says" she is on b/c is foolhardy and irrersponsible of the male.
But once a pregnancy is in place, the male's rights are then 100% in the female's hands. How is that remotely OK?
It's not OK. And even in the event responsible males use contraception, there is no contraception method that is 100% effective.
I'm with you... Either each can choose to terminate the pregnancy or, conversely, force parenthood, or neither can.
Now listen to the feminazis howl and complain on cue.
Howl and complain about....what? What you are describing is not the law or the reality. Do you understand that? I'm starting to wonder.
Alas it is not reality, it is my fantasy world wherein all kinds of other non pc things happen.
That it is not realistic doesn't mean it isn't how it ought to be.
it's unrealistic that transplant surgeons, firefighters and foster parents will be paid what rap artists, sports figures and models are paid. But it is still how I feel it ought to be.
#inmydreams
#bidirectionalequalityinreproduction
Last edited by VexedAndSolitary; 07-26-2017 at 10:55 AM..
Howl and complain about....what? What you are describing is not the law or the reality.
Why not? Otherwise, it's nothing more than sex-based discrimination, which is illegal. Women can choose but men cannot? That's sex discrimination. Plain and simple.
It's a complex situation to be sure, but I think the way we handle abortion rights and the confounding issue of financial support is the best possible of all options.
Why not? Otherwise, it's nothing more than sex-based discrimination, which is illegal. Women can choose but men cannot? That's sex discrimination. Plain and simple.
What are you howling and complaining about again? Why don't men just gestate/birth their own babies?
When you ask your elected officials this question and lobby them to enable children to grow up without the financial support of their fathers, what do they say? Just curious. Surely since you are so passionate about this topic you lobby for it and not just whine and complain on the internet ad nauseum, right?
When you ask your elected officials this question and lobby them to enable children to grow up without the financial support of their fathers, what do they say?
They're afraid of the feminazis that insist on giving women a choice but denying that same option to men.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.