Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2017, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,929,539 times
Reputation: 5932

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmaise View Post
No one seems to have mentioned this one.

However, on Twitter people are asking

"So when Trumps lawyer said that the "crimes were well past the statute of limitations" what does it mean?"

Palmer sums up the flap in this report:

Donald Trump's lawyers unwittingly admit to his financial crimes by talking about statute of limitations - Palmer Report

Apparently Maddow first caught the gaff made by a Trump attorney who apparently confessed Trump has committed crimes but they are past the statue of limitations.

Is this why Trump is so worried about Mueller digging too deeply?
Why, because his Dream would come to an end, which I doubt was all that much of a dream, just something on the bucket list, but he would not be loved, and that means everything to a Narcissist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2017, 08:34 PM
 
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,798,262 times
Reputation: 1932
Here is another article with a better citation of Maddow and what attorney said.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/07/thi...rachel-maddow/

“‘Those transactions are in my view well beyond the mandate of the special counsel,” Dowd was quoted as saying in Bloomberg. “‘They’re unrelated to the election of 2016 or any alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia and most importantly, they are well beyond any statute of limitations imposed by the U.S. Code.'”

Maddow was incredulous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2017, 08:42 PM
 
Location: Brackenwood
9,974 posts, read 5,669,596 times
Reputation: 22123
It's a real reach to claim that citing the statute of limitations is an admission of anything, the kind of reach used by people hoping to find something, anything to nail Trump because try as they might they just don't have anything to pin on him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2017, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,798,262 times
Reputation: 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
The Statute of Limitations for Frauds doesn't start until the fraud is discovered.
Likely Trump would owe taxes on any fraud.

"Finally, you often hear people say that the statute of limitations never runs on fraud. For civil tax fraud, that's true. The IRS can come after you any time. But it's still rare for the IRS to go back too far. Problems of proof are too great, and the IRS bears a high burden of proof in fraud cases, even civil fraud."

Cite: https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertw...is-everything/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2017, 08:46 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,702,895 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmaise View Post
No one seems to have mentioned this one.

However, on Twitter people are asking

"So when Trumps lawyer said that the "crimes were well past the statute of limitations" what does it mean?"

Palmer sums up the flap in this report:

Donald Trump's lawyers unwittingly admit to his financial crimes by talking about statute of limitations - Palmer Report

Apparently Maddow first caught the gaff made by a Trump attorney who apparently confessed Trump has committed crimes but they are past the statue of limitations.

Is this why Trump is so worried about Mueller digging too deeply?
I missed this but that is a stunning admission. What is incredibly clear is Trump has done something (or things) that he fears will be discovered. He has always feared his financials being exposed. He obviously feels extremely beholden to Russia. He obviously has been associating with people that lie about meetings with Russian diplomats and have been caught numerous times. And Trump does not get angry about the meetings, he gets angry about people finding out about the meetings. Come on, something is very wrong here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2017, 08:47 PM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,719 posts, read 16,828,251 times
Reputation: 41863
Oh, so Trump's crimes were done years ago ? Well, that makes me feel so much better.


Is his whole legal team as nuts as he is ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2017, 08:51 PM
 
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,798,262 times
Reputation: 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
It's a real reach to claim that citing the statute of limitations is an admission of anything, the kind of reach used by people hoping to find something, anything to nail Trump because try as they might they just don't have anything to pin on him.
I am not so sure.

Trump's attorney, Dowd, specifically said

"Those transactions" and "They" hence he must have been referring to something in Trump's past.

The problem is no one was discussing Trump's distant past at the time. The attorney must have had something on his mind.

I agree it is a reach, however when dealing with Trump and his clan have they lied and covered up things in the past?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2017, 08:52 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,434,576 times
Reputation: 10022
How does pointing out that any given transaction is beyond the statute of limitations for being considered/prosecuted as a crime in any way constitute admitting that a transaction was a crime?

What a load of hooey.

This is the kind of spin that earns the MSM the label of FAKE NEWS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2017, 08:58 PM
 
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,798,262 times
Reputation: 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
How does pointing out that any given transaction is beyond the statute of limitations for being considered/prosecuted as a crime in any way constitute admitting that a transaction was a crime?

What a load of hooey.

This is the kind of spin that earns the MSM the label of FAKE NEWS.
The same type of spin that a meeting about adoptions of Russian children was anything more?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2017, 09:18 PM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,472 posts, read 12,487,658 times
Reputation: 10440
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmaise View Post
No one seems to have mentioned this one.

However, on Twitter people are asking

"So when Trumps lawyer said that the "crimes were well past the statute of limitations" what does it mean?"

Palmer sums up the flap in this report:

Donald Trump's lawyers unwittingly admit to his financial crimes by talking about statute of limitations - Palmer Report

Apparently Maddow first caught the gaff made by a Trump attorney who apparently confessed Trump has committed crimes but they are past the statue of limitations.

Is this why Trump is so worried about Mueller digging too deeply?
No, Trumps lawyer did not say "crimes". In the click bait article that you posted, only the author of that hit piece said "crime", liberally tossing that word in a number of times

In the second link that was posted only Maddow said "crimes".

The lawyer never said that word and never even hinted at that word.

As Mircea stated, the SOL on fraud does not start until the fraud is discovered, so it's highly doubtful that the lawyer was speaking about the SOL on fraud .. no matter how much the writer in the click bait article is trying to lead people to believe.

The first article that was linked and your thread title are completely misleading.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top