Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-31-2017, 12:46 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,866 posts, read 46,327,178 times
Reputation: 18520

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
This Leftist from India who got herself elected to the City Council on the Socialist Alternative Party ticket, has pushed through a new income tax on anyone making over $250K ($500K for joing filers). This woman claims to accept only $40,00 of her $117,000 salary, but there are all kinds of red flags as to the accounting for the rest of her salary. This screams for a tax evasion investigation, or fraud.

It will be interesting to see how this turns out. The $15/hr min. wage she was instrumental in pushing through in Seattle has not turned out well for those affected by it, who are actually earning $125/mo. less since it's enactment, if they are lucky enough to still have a job.

This is the problem with socialist/Leftist thinking. In fact, they don't think. Leftists "feel," they don't know how to think.

Articles: Seattle's Income Tax Brings Out the Crazy in People


Ask Hugo Chavez how that works out in the end?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-31-2017, 12:53 PM
 
2,333 posts, read 1,475,112 times
Reputation: 922
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Are you aware of what's been happening in CA for the last two or three decades? People are leaving. Businesses are leaving. Brown and his government raise taxes to compensate. Repeat. We had enough. We left.
You don't have to tell me twice... I live in SF now. CA is quickly if not already approaching the breaking point but Seattle is still in good territory. I do not see people fleeing the state due to a 2% income tax on just the city. Heck, if that were true, I wouldn't need to fight a queue of people just to snag a 3 bedroom for less than $2m in Manhattan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 12:54 PM
 
2,333 posts, read 1,475,112 times
Reputation: 922
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Just outside the Seattle city limits. For example, Bill Gates lives in Medina, WA, not in Seattle. Look at a map.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Me...35473b0b26318f
And again I say, who is losing out in this scenario? WA keeps Gates. Suburb gets Gates. And there is still a LONG line of people willing to pay for the luxury of living in Seattle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 01:01 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,551 posts, read 44,252,621 times
Reputation: 13502
Quote:
Originally Posted by BicoastalAnn View Post
You don't have to tell me twice... I live in SF now. CA is quickly if not already approaching the breaking point but Seattle is still in good territory. I do not see people fleeing the state due to a 2% income tax on just the city.
They won't flee the state. They'll flee Seattle and move just outside the city limits. Easy to do in Seattle as it's not all that big of a city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 01:04 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,551 posts, read 44,252,621 times
Reputation: 13502
Quote:
Originally Posted by BicoastalAnn View Post
And again I say, who is losing out in this scenario? WA keeps Gates. Suburb gets Gates. And there is still a LONG line of people willing to pay for the luxury of living in Seattle.
I disagree. It's a small area. Don't have to live within the Seattle city limits to experience Seattle's business/cultural attractions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 01:05 PM
 
21,988 posts, read 15,605,133 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by BicoastalAnn View Post
And again I say, who is losing out in this scenario? WA keeps Gates. Suburb gets Gates. And there is still a LONG line of people willing to pay for the luxury of living in Seattle.
True. I wish it wasn't true, we have way way too many people moving here. We'll see if the tax passes, it's come up before but it typically gets voted down.

"In other words, an average of 236 people are moving to the Seattle area each day..."

Seattle region’s population growing at historic pace, making biggest annual gain in a century

https://www.geekwire.com/2016/seattl...-gain-century/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 01:06 PM
 
25,728 posts, read 16,346,047 times
Reputation: 15914
Will be hilarious when the Feds march into these cities and put their leadership in Federal prison.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 01:07 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,551 posts, read 44,252,621 times
Reputation: 13502
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
True. I wish it wasn't true, we have way way too many people moving here. We'll see if the tax passes, it's come up before but it typically gets voted down.

"In other words, an average of 236 people are moving to the Seattle area each day..."

https://www.geekwire.com/2016/seattl...-gain-century/
Seattle area. The extra tax impacts only those within the city limits of Seattle. Easily sidestepped. Live elsewhere. It's a small area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 01:09 PM
 
2,333 posts, read 1,475,112 times
Reputation: 922
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
They won't flee the state. They'll flee Seattle and move just outside the city limits. Easy to do in Seattle as it's not all that big of a city.
Right... I don't see this as a big issue. I think Seattle is starting to have a lot of issues due to their "hot" job/housing market and they need more resources to control it. Like SF, homelessness is becoming a big issue. Who's going to pay to manage that? I don't think it should be people in the 'burbs or elsewhere in the state so it kind of makes sense that city-residents pay to clean up the cities. I believe the city does need this money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 01:10 PM
 
77,712 posts, read 59,844,990 times
Reputation: 49102
I don't see this having a huge impact.

It's not like the Philly 5% city wage tax.

With that said, one has to wonder just how much money this is going to actually bring in?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top