Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-31-2017, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,579,444 times
Reputation: 25802

Advertisements

How was Hillary qualified? She didn't do anything as a Senator, and she was an UTTER FAILURE as Secretary of State, but to be fair so was her boss. UTTER FAILURE. She would have continued Obama's march for us to be just another European style SOCIALIST STATE. More horrible GDP growth, higher unemployment, higher deficits, and debt, more economic contraction, and a general feeling of malaise in an uninspired populace. Higher TAXES, and HIGHER energy costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-31-2017, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Kansas
25,961 posts, read 22,120,062 times
Reputation: 26699
Hillary Clinton was morally, mentally and physically incompetent in general, proven to be so time after time, so feminists were simply parroting what they heard on CNN, much easier than actually using one's brain. Feminists are single minded, and only really cared that Hillary Clinton was a female, and they thought she had the best chance, and frankly, with the sorry lineup of female Dem possibilities, they were probably right. I say this as a female who believe that to be equal is to be equal ALL THE TIME and not just when it works in one's favor. Feminists want to be equal except when it isn't working to their advantage, and then they put on their "vagina" hats! If you think with your crotch...........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 02:44 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,013,481 times
Reputation: 62204
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
I've heard that President Garfield is regarded as one of the most qualified ever. And there's hundreds others throughout history who had qualifications that dwarf those of modern presidential candidates. From what I can tell, Hillary was a failed lawyer and failed Secretary of State. Her legacies are Benghazi and failing the BAR exam and a fabricated story about being under sniper fire in Bosnia.
She was more qualified than Obama was in 2008. She actually ran something (the State Department)...which is not to say she ran it well or not, just to say she had more experience. She's lucky he gave it to her or she'd have none. I would say the same thing about any presidential candidate who never ran a d****d thing...which is why most of those lawyers on Capitol Hill aren't qualified to be president unless they also ran something before their Senate/Rep job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,897,671 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by donsabi View Post
The only reason Trump was elected was Clinton. Both the Republicans and Democrats are loyal to the elites. Many folks voted for Trump as a vote of desperation only to find an extreme elitist. Clinton may have acted more presidential but she is still a puppet of the elitists.
The only salvation for most Americans is a new political party.
If you didn't think Trump was an elitist, you are idiot that hasn't been paying attention in the last 30 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 04:22 PM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,954,135 times
Reputation: 8114
Are feminists serious when they say Hillary was the "most qualified presidential candidate ever"?



Would you really expect to hear otherwise from a feminists? Par for the course. She could be the worst candidate to ever get the nomination but because she's a woman feminists are naturally going say she is the "best ever"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 04:46 PM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,560,145 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty011 View Post
Are feminists serious when they say Hillary was the "most qualified presidential candidate ever"?



Would you really expect to hear otherwise from a feminists? Par for the course. She could be the worst candidate to ever get the nomination but because she's a woman feminists are naturally going say she is the "best ever"
Only an idiot would think she was not qualified, I don't care what said one is on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 04:47 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
I've heard that President Garfield is regarded as one of the most qualified ever. And there's hundreds others throughout history who had qualifications that dwarf those of modern presidential candidates. From what I can tell, Hillary was a failed lawyer and failed Secretary of State. Her legacies are Benghazi and failing the BAR exam and a fabricated story about being under sniper fire in Bosnia.
She is a typical polician who has always been out to do what's best for her. With only two real failures, she has an impressive track record of ladder climbing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 04:48 PM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,663,943 times
Reputation: 8602
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
I've heard that President Garfield is regarded as one of the most qualified ever. And there's hundreds others throughout history who had qualifications that dwarf those of modern presidential candidates. From what I can tell, Hillary was a failed lawyer and failed Secretary of State. Her legacies are Benghazi and failing the BAR exam and a fabricated story about being under sniper fire in Bosnia.
You say failed but all evidence says you are wrong.This thread failed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 05:01 PM
 
1,640 posts, read 794,884 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
How was Hillary qualified? She didn't do anything as a Senator, and she was an UTTER FAILURE as Secretary of State, but to be fair so was her boss. UTTER FAILURE. She would have continued Obama's march for us to be just another European style SOCIALIST STATE. More horrible GDP growth, higher unemployment, higher deficits, and debt, more economic contraction, and a general feeling of malaise in an uninspired populace. Higher TAXES, and HIGHER energy costs.
Have you actually reviewed her work in the senate...as in taking a look over at congress.gov? Have you read one of her books, dived into her policy or how she ran the state department? Something that would require a few hours to days vs the time it takes to watch a youtube video or listen to 30 minutes of talk radio?

Trump is intellectually deficient and likely mentally ill. A vote for Trump highlights a complete lack of standards. While I do believe Hillary lost due to deeply embedded sexism that humans will never be free of, that Trump won over Kasich or other options on the right speaks to a complete lack of integrity, intelligence, and engagement of the American voter. Trump is a clown and the US is his clown show.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2017, 05:16 PM
 
1,433 posts, read 1,062,936 times
Reputation: 3748
Say what you want about Trump but one thing is clear - the police, military, secret service, etc. love him and he pays them respect as well as lauds them......not so with Hillary. In fact, I just finished "In the President's Secret Service" in which current & former secret service agents were interviewed NONE had anything good to say about her as 1st lady and they despised her...in fact, they told of how she was verbally abusive, talked down to them , pretended like they weren't there or blamed them for her screw ups. They did like Bill Clinton who seemed like a good guy to all of them.

My point is you tell a lot about a leader or a person by what those who work closely with them or have them as superiors......and, in that (as she would've been as President I'm sure), she was (is) an utter failure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top