Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-09-2017, 03:10 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,601,062 times
Reputation: 9169

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
LOL! Throughout our history, it has been proven again and again and again that without exception, socialism, not capitalism, has resulted in, not just poverty for many, but poverty for ALL and everybody dying on the street, except for the socialist elites, of course.

Even you are so arrogant to ignore the history entirely, you only need to look at NK and Venezuela.

Also, please point out what poverty that capitalism has caused? Name one famine during peacetime that was caused by capitalism.
I can name it, gentrification. When people's housing costs get pushed up and up, but their wages stay flat. What's the solution to that one Batman?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-09-2017, 03:47 PM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,742,791 times
Reputation: 9728
One big problem I see with capitalism is that it is based on growth, which leads to many of the unhealthy developments we can see around us. Too much production, too much consumption, too much pollution, too much competition, too much greed, too much inequality, etc. - too much of everything. Everything seems to get infested with the money virus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Cannes
2,452 posts, read 2,381,116 times
Reputation: 1620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
One big problem I see with capitalism is that it is based on growth, which leads to many of the unhealthy developments we can see around us. Too much production, too much consumption, too much pollution, too much competition, too much greed, too much inequality, etc. - too much of everything. Everything seems to get infested with the money virus.
That's our nature... Evolution is driven by our wants and needs. All of our discoveries were based on people that wanted more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Iowa, USA
6,542 posts, read 4,094,282 times
Reputation: 3806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
One big problem I see with capitalism is that it is based on growth, which leads to many of the unhealthy developments we can see around us. Too much production, too much consumption, too much pollution, too much competition, too much greed, too much inequality, etc. - too much of everything. Everything seems to get infested with the money virus.
That's not entirely true though.

Capitalism is purely about the private ownership of industry. Growth isn't inherently required.

If I open up a hardware store, I can choose as my goal to make enough to live comfortably and that's it. No growth necessary. That's still fully capitalist.

The need for constant growth is a values based assessment. It fits nicely into capitalism, but isn't a requirement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 04:32 PM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,742,791 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by survivingearth View Post
That's our nature... Evolution is driven by our wants and needs. All of our discoveries were based on people that wanted more.
There is no evolution in humans anymore.
Many of those discoveries had better remained undiscovered. No colonial times, no genocides, economic fascism etc.
We had better correct our pseudo-nature in time, which is perfectly possible. There are interesting studies, which suggest our modern life style requires several times our current Earth. The only reason that is not a big problem yet is that many humans still live in utter poverty, without access to what we tell ourselves are human rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 04:35 PM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,742,791 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDusty View Post
That's not entirely true though.

Capitalism is purely about the private ownership of industry. Growth isn't inherently required.

If I open up a hardware store, I can choose as my goal to make enough to live comfortably and that's it. No growth necessary. That's still fully capitalist.

The need for constant growth is a values based assessment. It fits nicely into capitalism, but isn't a requirement.
Be that as it may, for some reason it seems that businesses are not happy anymore to stay the way they are.
I think it's because of the invention of stocks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 04:38 PM
 
Location: Iowa, USA
6,542 posts, read 4,094,282 times
Reputation: 3806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
Be that as it may, for some reason it seems that businesses are not happy anymore to stay the way they are.
I think it's because of the invention of stocks.
Well, now it's just precedent.

Competition is inevitable in capitalism. We've allowed the scale of competition to grow to a point where it's destructive. If one industry expands and attempts to corner a market, others have to as well to stay alive.

You don't have this problem when people care more about local economies. The thing is, it's rare the local economies can compete with the massive national and international ones. There's a reason Walmart is dirt cheap. It produces in bulk (and the product quality is lower... but it's purely meant to be consumed).

Many think capitalism is the problem with our current economy, but I don't agree. It's consumerism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 04:44 PM
 
Location: Cannes
2,452 posts, read 2,381,116 times
Reputation: 1620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
There is no evolution in humans anymore.
Many of those discoveries had better remained undiscovered. No colonial times, no genocides, economic fascism etc.
We had better correct our pseudo-nature in time, which is perfectly possible. There are interesting studies, which suggest our modern life style requires several times our current Earth. The only reason that is not a big problem yet is that many humans still live in utter poverty, without access to what we tell ourselves are human rights.
C'mon
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 04:46 PM
 
15,590 posts, read 15,669,164 times
Reputation: 21999
Quote:
Originally Posted by survivingearth View Post
I reside in Brazil where the major left-wing party has publicly demonstrated support to Maduro. How come people still think that communism and socialism works?

I admit I haven't read the whole thread, but the obvious question to me is - have you admitted that capitalism isn't working?

By the way, are you sure you live in Brazil? Your post says you're in Cannes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2017, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Finland
6,418 posts, read 7,249,167 times
Reputation: 10440
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDusty View Post
Well, now it's just precedent.

Competition is inevitable in capitalism. We've allowed the scale of competition to grow to a point where it's destructive. If one industry expands and attempts to corner a market, others have to as well to stay alive.

You don't have this problem when people care more about local economies. The thing is, it's rare the local economies can compete with the massive national and international ones. There's a reason Walmart is dirt cheap. It produces in bulk (and the product quality is lower... but it's purely meant to be consumed).

Many think capitalism is the problem with our current economy, but I don't agree. It's consumerism.
That is a very good point, consumerism is a big issue which is driving so many of the big problems of today. If people would put more of their money in the local economy and prefer to buy things that are long-lasting if more expensive then things would be better but that'd take quite a shift in mindset for many people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top