Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Every night we get together on a big web-conference (you're not invited) and decide what we are going to destroy next. We try and pick targets that will make you mad personally.
The confederate statues were the order of the day last week...we figured that since you love them so much, they needed to go.
I feel as though we're going to soon need threads to be approved by mods prior to posting.
This exact thread has been started hundreds of times. I'd imagine this isn't even the first time you've started this thread.
Enough is enough.
First off I haven't started a thread in months. I never seen a thread like this. I' and others made similar arguments before, but not as simplified and not buried in unrelated threads. Back off.
First off I haven't started a thread in months. I never seen a thread like this. I' and others made similar arguments before, but not as simplified and not buried in unrelated threads. Back off.
No, this thread talking about the 'Democrats strategy' has existed before, multiple times. Re-wording the base argument slightly doesn't make it different. Saying they're "failed strategy" isn't different. Calling it an "agenda" isn't different.
Every night we get together on a big web-conference (you're not invited) and decide what we are going to destroy next. We try and pick targets that will make you mad personally.
The confederate statues were the order of the day last week...we figured that since you love them so much, they needed to go.
The entire media did all come out with the agreed upon narrative of "only condemn and disavow one side as X" now that you mentioned it. You think the media doesn't collude with the Democrats and agree on a narrative?
No, this thread talking about the 'Democrats strategy' has existed before, multiple times. Re-wording the base argument slightly doesn't make it different. Saying they're "failed strategy" isn't different. Calling it an "agenda" isn't different.
Well by your standard lots of threads are a replay of concepts. I never seen the thread and most of my ideas are my own.
The democrat's old strategy play against Republicans:
1. Disavow "X" and agree "X" should be silenced, censored, banned, purged etc.
2. You are "X" and a, b and c are "X"
It's just a strategy for the Left to silence anyone or discredit anything on the Right they disagree with. And is why free speech is for all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDusty
I feel as though we're going to soon need threads to be approved by mods prior to posting.
This exact thread has been started hundreds of times. I'd imagine this isn't even the first time you've started this thread.
Enough is enough.
Did you really miss that you just made his point? Are you that oblivious?
You are a progressive that wants to shut down things you disagree with, and do not believe free speech is a right for anyone who disagrees with you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
