Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A bunch of narcissist ladies who thought it would be fun to provoke in order to get attention, that's who. They knew what they were doing, and can feign ignorance and turn it back on those who got upset.
The haters "express fury" because women decide to wear a political hat, and acknowledging who's at fault is "turning it on them." I see.
Proof, yet again, that we can thank conservatives for preserving our freedoms, most importantly freedom of speech and expression--um...like burning the American flag. Some people still haven't learned to live with differences of opinion and expressions of those opinions in ways they find odious.
Gawd bless the [w]ussification of the American male.
If they are walking around naked then yeah, I might lay a little blame their way. But a better analogy is to poke the bear over and over and it is not in a cage, yes I blame the person for getting mauled and eaten, they asked for it otherwise they would not poke the bear to see its reaction.
No. My analogy is better.
In this case, some girls went to lunch at HU wearing a MAGA hat and T shirt. These girls were assaulted, battered, and had theft committed against them because of the clothing they wore. Some people here blamed the girls for wearing the type of clothing they wore.
That is perfectly analogous to this:
A girl goes to a place where lots of dodgy men hang out wearing skimpy clothing and gets raped and then some people blame her for wearing the type of clothing she wore.
Much better than your analogy, because in mine, the facts are nearly identical. Only the crime differed. My girls did not poke anyone.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas
Nice try, Skippy, maybe you should try a more original tactic, that trick got old long ago.
In this case, some girls went to lunch at HU wearing a MAGA hat and T shirt. These girls were assaulted, battered, and had theft committed against them because of the clothing they wore. Some people here blamed the girls for wearing the type of clothing they wore.
That is perfectly analogous to this:
A girl goes to a place where lots of dodgy men hang out wearing skimpy clothing and gets raped and then some people blame her for wearing the type of clothing she wore.
Much better than your analogy, because in mine, the facts are nearly identical. Only the crime differed. My girls did not poke anyone.
No idea what you are trying to say.
"skippy"............its an old derogatory term.....used to infer that you have no reasoning powers.......
Exactly, they should have been arrested for trespassing. Why do black folks even entertain these clowns?
You can't arrest them for trespassing because there is no policy against coming onto campus for a bite to eat.
Now if they were asked to leave and refused...then the white girls would be violating the non-aggression principle.
That didn't happen here.
My point was if Howard is going to have a problem with the clothes people wear, as a private institution, they should have the right to refuse to allow those people on campus.
I think Howard should assert its rights as owners of the property and put up signs saying "No White People".
It's obvious they believe these girls were a threat to others on campus.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sigh.
