Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-23-2017, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780

Advertisements

Poor ol' tRump!

The news channels are reporting on all of his negativity. I've never seen such an anti-American, pessimistic, doom & gloomer.

What a big bellyacher.

Carry on.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2017, 12:34 PM
 
8,414 posts, read 7,409,375 times
Reputation: 8752
Quote:
Originally Posted by max210 View Post
Tucker Carlson is about the only watchable news reporting on TV nowadays.
And all it took was the bloodbath of firings and departures of prime-time personnel at Fox News Channel.

If Tucker Carlson is so good, why didn't he have his own prime time show before 'The Reckoning' occurred?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 12:39 PM
 
7,447 posts, read 2,832,049 times
Reputation: 4922
Thanks for reminding me why random internet dwellers are terrible sources to go to for parsing of scientific studies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 12:40 PM
 
Location: NY/LA
4,663 posts, read 4,548,055 times
Reputation: 4140
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
Comparing Madoff to the same level as Trump, proves the point that the mainstream media is no longer objective or honest.
I'm curious. How is that proof?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 12:43 PM
 
25,842 posts, read 16,521,023 times
Reputation: 16025
Fox is the news for grown ups.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 12:45 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,850,642 times
Reputation: 9283
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
The Left still think Fox News is the most biased news network in existence, while CNN is still in the middle.
The left has been crazy... they are not about to be less crazy even if you show them a mirror... they would likely scream obscenities at themselves and not realize they were talking to their own reflection...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 12:48 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,868 posts, read 26,498,769 times
Reputation: 25766
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Folks...obviously you dont understand what the study is showing.

If you had some mass murderer that tortured people to death for giggles...would you want to listen to the news that said good things about him 50% of the time? Would THAT be the balanced news you wanted?

I can't believe you people fall for things like this.
So...who has Trump tortured to death? (note-liberal's heads exploding when confronted with reality doesn't count)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,862 posts, read 9,527,489 times
Reputation: 15578
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
Wow, twisting reality with your headline, no?

Just because some networks have negative coverage of somebody, does not mean they aren't "balanced." It may just be that the person they are covering really, truly is a moron who deserves every bit of scorn he receives. If networks have negative coverage of a moron, they're just being honest. If any network has negative or even just 50-50 coverage of a moron, THEY are the ones who are actually unbalanced.
I think this bears repeating. It has nothing to do with torturing anyone to death. It has everything to do with the media giving to somebody what they deserve, and whether doing so is 'fair and balanced.' Right-wingers can't seem to understand it. When you explain logic to them, their heads explode.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 01:09 PM
 
9,639 posts, read 6,015,891 times
Reputation: 8567
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
Wow, twisting reality with your headline, no?

Just because some networks have negative coverage of somebody, does not mean they aren't "balanced." It may just be that the person they are covering really, truly is a moron who deserves every bit of scorn he receives. If networks have negative coverage of a moron, they're just being honest. If any network has negative or even just 50-50 coverage of a moron, THEY are the ones who are actually unbalanced.
I just noticed that too.


The link the OP posted has nothing to do with political bias.

It was simply whether the article studied was negative or positive. A negative article is not always biased against just as a positive article isn't always biased in favor of something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 01:19 PM
 
16,212 posts, read 10,819,047 times
Reputation: 8442
I agree with this portion of the article in the OP:
Quote:
"The fact that Trump has received more negative coverage than his predecessor is hardly surprising. The early days of his presidency have been marked by far more missteps and miss-hits, often self-inflicted, than any presidency in memory, perhaps ever," Patterson wrote.
I think he does have more negative press because he does not exude a high level of professionalism (he is immature), he attempts to rush through things that need more thought and consideration and framing (the immigration "ban" which was mentioned as having the highest amount of negative press and rightly so. He signed an EO with no implementation policy in place or ready to go into place and didn't take long enough to frame the language), and also doesn't know how to shut up about certain things - like the Charlottesville thing of late (he recently gave a speech about his Charlottesville speech at a rally) and even in the not too distant past (spoke too often and had his staff too often speak of "crowd sizes" at his inauguration. This is a non-story/non-issue that he made an issue).

So I think he is just not a decent leader and when people see that - and the press is run by people - they will pounce upon every opportunity they get to denigrate you. You get up and make contradictory statements, outright lies, or continuously bring up controversial statements that you, yourself, stated as president and you are apt to be treated negatively by the press.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top