Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She's just another entity trying to bring down the legitimate Presidency of Donald Trump, like the other Democrats, and Media. It is an attempt to undermine our sovereignty through subterfuge.
Interviewed by Jane Pauley for CBS’ Sunday Morning, Hillary Clinton admitted that she was so confident of victory in the 2016 election that she bought a second home next door to her estate in Chappaqua, New York to accommodate White House staff during her expected presidential retreats.
According to the New York Post, the Clintons paid $1.16 million for the three-bedroom, ranch-style home. The Post had reported in September 2016 that the house was supposed to be a weekend retreat for Chelsea Clinton’s family.
Location: Born & Raised DC > Carolinas > Seattle > Denver
9,338 posts, read 7,109,569 times
Reputation: 9487
9th. This is the 9th thread created by conservatives about Hillary's book in the last week or so LOL.
We all realize that it would make more sense to just consolidate all the anti-Clinton/Hillary Book threads into one giant "those who hate Hillary and her book " thread, I realize it's "quantity over quality" for many when it comes to bashing your opponents. LOL
She's just another entity trying to bring down the legitimate Presidency of Donald Trump, like the other Democrats, and Media. It is an attempt to undermine our sovereignty through subterfuge.
True! And you'd think if the dems are so determined to get one of their own elected they would spend their time more effectively in doing all they could to come up with a candidate who might have a chance instead of their continuing saga of sour grapes and pouting.
She's the gift that keeps on giving, and while Jane Pauley at 67 still looks HOT, Hillary Clinton at 69 well, you see what I mean. Yes, I know Pauley is married to big lib Gary Trudeau.
She's your typical liberal. It's always someone else's fault. ALWAYS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks
What's your point? This is neither political nor controversial. After all, Hilary is no longer a politician. Do Trump supporters really feel that threatened by the loser in a presidential race?
Tell it to your hero, HIllary. When she goes away and stops writing silly books, we'll stop talking about her.
'Til then, she's making herself game.
And seriously, how on God's Green Earth can you possibly say this subject isn't political? Good Grief!
Threatened? lolololol. No, dear. We're pointing and laughing. That is, of course, our right, contrary to what liberals may think.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999
Last time I looked, Hillary had the American MSM and Hollywood on her side campaigning for her and over 1 billion dollars to destroy all of her opponents, nothing that Russia could have done allegedly from the WikiLeaks could top the advantages Hillary had over Trump.
And that's a big part of why she lost. Nobody in their right mind trusts the MSM, and Hollywood is just plain irritating and laughable. Nobody takes those shriekers and ranters seriously.
Who's the latest Hollywood goofball to bellyache? Katy Perry? Jennifer Lawrence? Yeah, like I'm gonna pay attention to those bimbos.
Last edited by MyNameIsBellaMia; 09-11-2017 at 12:18 PM..
What's your point? This is neither political nor controversial. After all, Hilary is no longer a politician. Do Trump supporters really feel that threatened by the loser in a presidential race?
Speaking as someone who most decidedly is not a Trump supporter, I’m sick and tired of Hillary Clinton. Historically, the losers in presidential elections have just sort of blended into the woodwork—I had to look up Michael Dukakis recently just to see if he was still living! Clinton refuses to get out of the spotlight.
The list of people (and things) she blames for her own incompetence and corruption continues to grow to epic proportions. Now, it even includes various members of her own political party. She even blames her devoted, cultish followers for not giving her enough support in the election.
While I have no personal interest in the viability of either of the dominant capitalist parties in the country, Clinton is certainly damaging The Democratic Party by not allowing others to move to the forefront and not allowing that party to establish something resembling an actual ideological platform.
Far more damaging is the fact that her narcissism is also preventing the discussion of serious issues within American society, even as her “Russia did it” narrative, parroted by the corporate media and neocon Republicans, drives the world towards the brink of major conflict.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
