Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-05-2017, 06:46 AM
 
Location: Central NJ and PA
5,034 posts, read 2,237,232 times
Reputation: 3919

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by clikrf8 View Post
Get your facts straight. The land was combined BLM and USFS land, all federal. Federal land does NOT belong to Utah citizens; it belongs to the citizens of the United States. If the Feds are coerced into selling the land, guess what the state does? They sell it to private interests and up go the gates. The feds can operate at a deficit; not the states. Due to Mormonism, Utah’s schools are bursting. State government wants fed land so they can sell it for schools. It’s already happened in two large recent sales.

And gated private property means no access unless you get permission and/or pay for the privilege. If you hunt, fish, hike, bike, 4 wheel, photograph, you will be sol.

ETA: some national monuments allow hunting and fishing.
Shows what you know about Mormonism and Utah. Yes, Mormons are known for having large families, just as Catholics are. The reality, these days, is that there are very few Mormon families having more than two or three kids. The increase in the school population is due to immigration, from both domestic and international people. The Provo/Orem area (that used to be two separate towns) is one of the fastest growing in all the United States. Not even Mormons can reproduce that fast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-05-2017, 07:28 AM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,043,506 times
Reputation: 2814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
If they remove the designation it will be open for mining and other exploration, yet Zeinke claims he is giving it back to the people. Who exactly are these "people", oil and mining companies because the new definition indicates companies are people.
How much mining has been done in the Bears Ears area in all the years before it was made a national monument in December 2016?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2017, 08:11 AM
 
Location: San Diego
50,079 posts, read 46,654,631 times
Reputation: 33931
Quote:
Originally Posted by clikrf8 View Post
Get your facts straight. The land was combined BLM and USFS land, all federal. Federal land does NOT belong to Utah citizens; it belongs to the citizens of the United States. If the Feds are coerced into selling the land, guess what the state does? They sell it to private interests and up go the gates. The feds can operate at a deficit; not the states. Due to Mormonism, Utah’s schools are bursting. State government wants fed land so they can sell it for schools. It’s already happened in two large recent sales.

And gated private property means no access unless you get permission and/or pay for the privilege. If you hunt, fish, hike, bike, 4 wheel, photograph, you will be sol.

ETA: some national monuments allow hunting and fishing.
BLM close gates and access all the time. Right now there is a no shooting ban and when there is even a % chance of rain they slam the gates shut.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2017, 08:51 AM
 
5,301 posts, read 2,089,337 times
Reputation: 2561
Quote:
Originally Posted by swilliamsny View Post
Shows what you know about Mormonism and Utah. Yes, Mormons are known for having large families, just as Catholics are. The reality, these days, is that there are very few Mormon families having more than two or three kids. The increase in the school population is due to immigration, from both domestic and international people. The Provo/Orem area (that used to be two separate towns) is one of the fastest growing in all the United States. Not even Mormons can reproduce that fast.
Still two separate cities They refer to them together to name a metropolitan area. Also, at least some do homeschool here, which would lessen some of the school need in that sense. I don’t have many kids and it does seem to be waning. When I was growing up (not here) I knew a family who had 14?15? Kids. I forget how many. Some still have a lot of kids, but it seems more on the level of 6 or so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2017, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Long Island
56,925 posts, read 25,848,610 times
Reputation: 15453
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eeyore1954 View Post
How much mining has been done in the Bears Ears area in all the years before it was made a national monument in December 2016?
I don’t know but that is a poor argument since Trump is quite different as evidenced in his plans for Alaska
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2017, 09:02 AM
 
15,469 posts, read 10,387,757 times
Reputation: 15704
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
BLM close gates and access all the time. Right now there is a no shooting ban and when there is even a % chance of rain they slam the gates shut.
They have a strange habit of permanently bulldozing entrances off to, it's so annoying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2017, 09:04 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,282 posts, read 54,070,915 times
Reputation: 40572
Trump Cutting Back on National Monuments


In time he'll probably tell us Trump Tower should be a national monument. (couldn't find an emoji for nausea)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2017, 09:14 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,421 posts, read 20,207,237 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
It looks like Trump's Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke is proposing downsizing and reducing restrictions including allowing ranching and logging in:

Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante in Utah
Cascade-Siskiyou in Oregon
Gold Butte in Nevada
Katahdin in Maine
Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks and Rio Grande Del Norte in New Mexico

Allowing commercial fishing in:

Northeast Canyons and Seamount off the Massachusetts coast and
Rose Atoll and the Pacific Remote Islands

If these states don't care what Trump is doing to them, so be it but every day Trump continues to try to wreck this country. Will national parks be next? A government funded Trump hotel in Yellowstone?

10 national monuments could shrink or face cutbacks under Interior plan - cetusnews
Excuse me, but the Federal Government had no business telling these States what to do with their land it the first place. The Federal Government was not given any authority over State lands by the Constitution. If you think it was, please show me where?

Now tell me again who is "wrecking" this country? It isn't Donald Trump!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2017, 09:46 AM
 
1,221 posts, read 2,098,792 times
Reputation: 1766
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Excuse me, but the Federal Government had no business telling these States what to do with their land it the first place. The Federal Government was not given any authority over State lands by the Constitution. If you think it was, please show me where?
Certainly, the exact line of the US Constitution is Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2. Also known as the "Property Clause".

Quote:
The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

If you'd like an actually researched and sourced document, please read this: http://www.law.umaryland.edu/marshal...7_12032007.pdf

And here's the right-leaning Heritage Foundation: Guide to the Constitution

You will find zero credible scholars who believe the Constitution does not allow the federal government to own land. They may disagree on the scope of what the federal government's powers are (ex: Are they just like a private landowner or does it being federal property give the feds their own police power over it?), but the even the strictest interpretations make the federal government owning and holding land legal.

I'm sure none of that will convince you, of course.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Old 12-05-2017, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,493,601 times
Reputation: 7472
Why aren't the same people who are angry about monuments being done away with upset about this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top