Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,391,085 times
Reputation: 24780

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by amenalot View Post
Well Comey won't be there to protect Hillary next time she's investigated.
Remember last year Comey tried to say she's innocent because she didn't have "intent", even though intent was not a criteria....
Comey's BS was the only thing saving her.

tRump promised to jail Hillary.

Pubs have been trash-talking for decades.

They now OWN America. Now's the time to pounce on her. The whole table is set for them.

What are they waiting for?

What are they afraid of?


 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:15 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,741,271 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by amenalot View Post
Well Comey won't be there to protect Hillary next time she's investigated.
Remember last year Comey tried to say she's innocent because she didn't have "intent", even though intent was not a criteria....
Comey's BS was the only thing saving her.
Despite right-wing fantasies, Comey didn't protect Hillary...ever.

Hillary isn't some super-criminal. Investigation after investigation have yielded nothing. The real crime is the repeat investigations costing taxpayers huge sums of money. Wasted.

The investigations have been exhausted. Try to find something else to salivate over.
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:43 AM
 
29,886 posts, read 11,448,599 times
Reputation: 18388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Judicial Watch are a right-wing organization with an agenda. Not gonna happen. Maybe they should focus their attention on the current investigation, or that what they want to distract us from
Mueller has the other one covered. They have sued both democrat and republican administrations. All three administrations before Trump were sued by them.

For example:

Bush Administration

In July 2003 Judicial Watch joined the environmental organization Sierra Club in suing the George W. Bush administration for access to minutes of Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force.[7] Judicial Watch was involved in a similar legal dispute with Vice President Dick Cheney in 2002 when the group filed a shareholder lawsuit against Halliburton. The lawsuit, which accused Halliburton of accounting fraud, alleged that "when Mr. Cheney was chief executive of Halliburton, he and other directors inflated revenue reports, boosting Halliburton's share price." [8] As reported by the Wall Street Journal the court filing claims the oil-field-services concern overstated revenue by a total of $445 million from 1999 through the end of 2001.[9]
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:47 AM
 
18,986 posts, read 9,000,660 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackwinkelman View Post
Judicial Watch is actually very credible. You don't know of what you speak. They are infamous in filing FOIA requests. Something that all Americans should support.
Judicial Watch is the antithesis of credible. It's one of the original birther sites. That should tell you everything you need to know about them.

Last edited by JAMS14; 09-19-2017 at 11:16 AM..
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:49 AM
 
29,886 posts, read 11,448,599 times
Reputation: 18388
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Despite right-wing fantasies, Comey didn't protect Hillary...ever.

Hillary isn't some super-criminal.
Hillary isn't a super anything. Run of the mill criminal like a run of the mill politician. Average at best. That is why both of her attempts at the presidency ended in defeat.
 
Old 09-19-2017, 11:02 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,741,271 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackwinkelman View Post
Hillary isn't a super anything. Run of the mill criminal like a run of the mill politician. Average at best. That is why both of her attempts at the presidency ended in defeat.
If she's a "run-of-the-mill criminal", then all those investigations that turned up zilch were conducted by....????
 
Old 09-19-2017, 11:10 AM
 
10,570 posts, read 4,208,376 times
Reputation: 5697
^ Zilch? Read Comey's findings last year, he found enough to indict her but chose not to because she didn't have "intent" (despite intent not being a criteria).
 
Old 09-19-2017, 11:19 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,741,271 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by amenalot View Post
^ Zilch? Read Comey's findings last year, he found enough to indict her but chose not to because she didn't have "intent" (despite intent not being a criteria).
Zilch. Read Comey's statement. No prosecutor would have filed charges. There is no evidence that any of the information handled by her personal server ever ended up in any illicit hands, she didn't have any intent to compromise information. Your desire to prosecute is based on your animosity, not on any real damage.
 
Old 09-19-2017, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,391,085 times
Reputation: 24780
Talking So, do it already

Quote:
Originally Posted by amenalot View Post
^ Zilch? Read Comey's findings last year, he found enough to indict her but chose not to because she didn't have "intent" (despite intent not being a criteria).

The FBI doesn't indict.

That's the Justice Dept's responsibility.

Now that tRump has his own boy at the FBI and his little elf at Justice, what's he waiting for?

A green light?

 
Old 09-19-2017, 11:25 AM
 
16,579 posts, read 20,618,921 times
Reputation: 26860
Quote:
Originally Posted by amenalot View Post
^ Zilch? Read Comey's findings last year, he found enough to indict her but chose not to because she didn't have "intent" (despite intent not being a criteria).
So why hasn't Jeff Sessions indicted her?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top