Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What other evidence?...Show me and post something that supports your point of view from some peer reviewed papers ....
There is no such thing, their job is to support the prevailing narrative. The issue is political not scientific [too many jobs, money and special interest in between] so they continue to manipulate the data to their conclusions.
The evidence will come went winters get harsher and summers shorter. But then they'll just say it's man that's making the earth cold.
There is no such thing, their job is to support the prevailing narrative. The issue is political not scientific [too many jobs, money and special interest in between] so they continue to manipulate the data to their conclusions.
The evidence will come went winters get harsher and summers shorter. But then they'll just say it's man that's making the earth cold.
both sides have made the climate change debate political. the skeptics want to avoid the taxes and regulations the alarmists want to impose on the people. the alarmists want these regulations and taxes to control the people more.
peer review is crap as i have told you many times in the past. especially in this time of politicization of this area of science. but i hav ein the past posted evidence that you have either refuse to look at, or ignored because it didnt meet your view point on the subject. as i said, perhaps one day you will open your eyes, and you will start looking at everything the skeptics put out as evidence, and you will do it with a neutral eye. once again though i dont hold out any hope that you will do this anytime soon, or even anytime in the next decade.
and since you are a stubborn cultist, i am done with you.
Good, as there is no point in discussing science with someone who denies all science.
What other evidence?...Show me and post something that supports your point of view from some peer reviewed papers ....
There is no such thing, their job is to support the prevailing narrative. The issue is political not scientific [too many jobs, money and special interest in between] so they continue to manipulate the data to their conclusions.
...
"This is the inescapable conclusion of a landmark paper, published in Nature Geoscience, which finally admits that the computer models have overstated the impact of carbon dioxide on climate and that the planet is warming more slowly than predicted."
Have you noticed that "issues" like climate change and abortion and gun rights have pretty much gone off the radar screen? That is because with Trump, the very existence of our American democracy is at stake. When your house is burning down, why would you take the time to put out some little brush fire?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
