Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-23-2017, 11:31 AM
 
29,531 posts, read 9,704,508 times
Reputation: 3466

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Haakon View Post
According to gun control advocate, never met a firearm law she didn't like, Diane Feinstein (D), CA (of course) no new laws would have prevented it, but that doesn't stop them from trying to exploit innocent deaths to push their political agenda.
Just want to point out, perhaps to temper the paranoia and/or fervor...

There are 535 members of Congress, for a reason.

BTW, providing a source or link to the quote really should be part of such a comment.

Like this for example...

Feinstein’s bill to ban “bump stocks,” which the gunman used to drastically increase his rate of fire as he killed 58 people Sunday night, got a significant boost on Thursday: The National Rifle Association — a longtime Feinstein adversary — said it supported “additional regulations” on the mechanism. Bump stocks are already banned in California.

http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/0...alifornia-101/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2017, 11:37 AM
 
Location: San Diego
18,718 posts, read 7,599,790 times
Reputation: 14988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Chalk up another person who has no problem with giving government the authority to control and restrict the people's right to keep and bear arms.
Quote:
Originally Posted by saturno_v View Post
You already give that authority when you buy a gun at a gun shop.
Nonsense, I have done no such thing.

BTW, in case you're puzzled, the Constitution says flatly that no govt in the U.S. can make any law restricting or taking away my right to own and carry a gun. And it even gives the reason why. So your strange assertion that I implicitly give govt the power to do that, merely by buying a gun at a gun shop, is ridiculous on its face.

The 2nd amendment says in modern language:

"Since an armed and capable populace is necessary for security and freedom, the right of any ordinary person to own or carry a gun or other such weapon, cannot be taken away or restricted."

The assumption of some implied authority, is a loony extension of something that flatly does not exist. Why on earth do you believe it does?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2017, 11:39 AM
 
29,531 posts, read 9,704,508 times
Reputation: 3466
Quote:
Originally Posted by stiffnecked View Post
Why are liberals too ashamed to admit we have a human problem? Why can't they admit it is actually a human that does the killing? Because without the human in the equation the violence wouldn't have happened. We have a human violence problem. Until they acknowledge and admit that nothing will change.
Wait a minute!

You mean it is humans that do the killing? Not the guns? Imagine that...

Why I never thought of it that way! Thanks!

Another most excellent point...

End of thread then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2017, 11:42 AM
 
29,531 posts, read 9,704,508 times
Reputation: 3466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
How many good Americans are going to die because they refuse to give up their guns?
Interesting question. Not sure I understand it, but interesting.

Sometimes interesting can actually be found in a thread like this one. Rare, but it happens...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2017, 11:43 AM
 
Location: San Diego
18,718 posts, read 7,599,790 times
Reputation: 14988
One of the most important effects to letting everybody carry a gun if they want to, is deterrence. If all so-called "gun control" laws were eliminated (i.e. if the 2nd amendment were actually obeyed), making it legal for any adult to carry, most of them still wouldn't bother. But a few would. And a criminal who's thinking about robbing someone, or raping or even murdering, he'd have to think twice knowing that there are probably a few people in the crowd who have a gun and know how to use it. He'd never know which one(s) it is, and so couldn't know who to defend against until too late.

And so he may well decide not to commit his robbery or murder at all. A few truly insane criminals would still go ahead. But a large number of crimes would now never happen in the first place. All without a shot being fired.

But how would we know, exactly, how many crimes got prevented this way? The effect is, simply nothing happened. How to you quantify that, effective and beneficial though it is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2017, 11:44 AM
 
Location: PSL
8,224 posts, read 3,494,933 times
Reputation: 2963
Quote:
Originally Posted by LearnMe View Post
However is right...

1) Not true. There are people devoted to finding ways to avoid other sources of tragedy nearly full time, all the time. Tragedies simply tend to bring those efforts and arguments to the forefront amidst all else that goes on in our lives on an ongoing basis. This same dynamic applies to a great many other issues like aircraft safety, children's toys and crib safety, fire prevention and on and on. Plane goes down killing all aboard and that becomes the story of the day and renewed/heightened focus on flight safety, for example. Nothing unique to the subject of gun control there.

2) The contention is that all manner in which to possibly prevent or reduce tragedies should be seriously considered, evaluated and action determined according to what constitutes sound public policy. Of course that's the contention and the essence of the debate over what works and what doesn't.

3) True. There are countless ways we can die, be killed and/or suffer from tragedy. This is not a point confused by anyone far as I know and generally not worth making. Note, stair cases are now built to code as a result of too many stair case accidents occurring because steps were too narrow or too steep back in the old days (I had an old home with such a stair case that would not be built or meet code today).

4) "Fervor" is a hard thing to measure and awfully subjective. Some people, who have lost a loved one due to Paddock for example, are likely to experience some "fervor" about this subject one way or another. Others have hardly any emotion about it at all, because they are busy with focus on other things, like NASCAR racing or the World Series. All depends on who your dealing with and being specific along those lines is far more productive than these broad-brush profiles of what the "other side" thinks.

5) Can't speak for any or all gun control advocates and either can you, but I think you do a very good job of incorrectly making their arguments for them or suggesting they are "silent" on other significant causes of death. Cancer from smoking cigarettes comes to mind, another example of countless others that people have hardly been "silent" about.

6) The issue regarding any tragedy has little to do with the number or nature of other tragedies. This is a point that gun enthusiasts seem to struggle with mightily. Also that just about any source of tragedy is constantly being considered and addressed by those in the industries having to do with those tragedies, be they the auto industry, food industry, energy industry, etc.

7) I have engaged in pointing out what arguments are fairly sound, agreeable, and which are not so much, even ridiculous ALL CONSIDERED.

That last statement I put in bold above is utterly ridiculous, to the point I have to believe you know it. I have two kids, lots of good friends and family. Anyone who knows me can tell you how ridiculous your claim truly is. Surely your just trying to get me into a fervor, but I don't usually let emotions get the better of me.
1. You're equating mechanical malfunctions of an aircraft, a commandeered cockpit, or radar malfunction... to firearm legislation?
There are guidelines that firearms manufactures must abide by. They can't go selling firearms that would explode in your face... that's the equivalency to mechanical failure of an air craft.
Commandeered cockpit can be prevented if the **** pit door is locked and can't be compromised along with an armed guard. Firearms manufacturers are not liable for the end users decisions/intent.
Radar malfunction... can't really draw a conclusive relevant equivalency to firearms unless the end user has failed eye sight and/or plain ignorant.
Be sure of your target and what's beyond it. You own that projectile and whatever it hits.

2. I do not wish to be a part of a training wheel feels good society where everything is controlled. That is the main reason I put a programmer in my 14 Silverado. To get rid of traction control, stability control, and ABS.

3. Again. False equivalency of a building code to a firearm as the manufacturer has to comply with regulations via ATF. That stair case you gave an example of, could be relevant if you want to compare a Colt SP1 from 1963 that had a fun switch (with the 200 dollar tax) to a new AR varient which does not have the fun switch...
Or compare building codes where I lived in NY to here in Florida...
I renovated my house roof, added a porch, redid all of the electrical and the heating system. All I needed was to pay for the permit and have the respective inspector sign off after I completed the work. Florida. You need to be licensed to do anything.

4. Pro sports irrelevant to constitutionally protected rights.

5. Cigarettes and other threats to safety and well being are risks. There are places in Florida you can go into and sit down and smoke cigarettes. Outdoor and indoor.
In MA NY CT it is illegal to smoke inside.

6. The issue is quite simple. God given constitutionally protected freedoms > emotion every time. Regardless who, where, when. When you flip the emotion switch to off, life becomes alot less complicated and stressful. Try it. It's awesome.
It sounds harsh. Was the same argument I had with anti gun legislators in town hall meetings in NY. My words were how dare you exploit tragedy in vain. If you are that easily compelled by emotion you are unfit to make clear rational decisions and should not hold any authority over citizens to write and sign off on laws that impede freedom.

7. You've admitted to me previously you are frustrated... you're point is moot.

Just be honest and say I don't support anyone's right to equip themselves as they see fit. I'm either scared or angry about events like this happening and therfore I blame the instrument not the end user and their intent. I want this that and the other restricted and modified to meet my ideal utopian beliefs.

We want the same things. Really we do. We just have different approaches to it.

You'd rather see AR/AK/M1 styled rifles with detachable magazines and legal modifications go the way of the carburetor. Because you're scared or angry...

I'd rather remove scumbags intent. Id rather remove their incentive. Reverse any law that holds someone accountable for acting in either self defense of property and life, or acting in others defense of property and life.
That means. No more gun free zones. That means no more being liable for wrongful death suit manslaughter or murder when defending your life/property or community life/property.

Remember. Law enforcement is just that. Enforcing the law. Not prevention. Simply put.
You may install an ADT home security system as a deterrence to home invasions. You may install impact resistant glass in the house and superior locks in all of your doors.
It won't keep a criminal from breaking in. What will, is the racking of the slide of a glock, the charging handle of an AR/AK, or pump action.
What would stop a school shooting? Armed teachers. Who could thwart a would be attacker.
Vegas situation. Anyone who heard gun fire erupt respond with extreme prejudice and drop the scumbag themselves.

Adding cameras, metal detectors, explosive detectors, will only test the ingenuity of the attackers. They're a monitoring system nothing more nothing less.
Alot of good a metal detector would do if you fabricated a weapon entirely of carbon fiber and ceramic hiding springs and such in luggage.
You'd just test development of undetectable propellants. Heck could even have air powered weaponry...

At what point do you draw the line of trading liberty for security?

I don't want to live in a protective bubble.
I don't want to have padded floors walls and a suit with built in airbags should I trip and fall.
I don't want to be under constant surveillance while I am inside my home or outside my home.
I don't want government supplied transportation.

I like my freedom. I like my independence. I like living life without interference or restrictions or a nanny to dictate life to me based on their subjective interpretation of what is safe... I'll take my chances. Average life span is what nowadays 80? That leaves me with what... 40-50 years to go?

If anything happens to me before then ohwell. Don't cry for me. I'm not here forever. Just long enough to have fun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2017, 11:46 AM
 
29,531 posts, read 9,704,508 times
Reputation: 3466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ex New Yorker View Post
Great! There will no longer be any insane people of the next generation. Damn I wish I'd though of that.
Francis Galton beat you to it long ago...

AKA Eugenics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2017, 11:46 AM
 
Location: San Diego
18,718 posts, read 7,599,790 times
Reputation: 14988
People from the present day all the way back to America's founding, knew that the country would be safer and more free if government had no power to restrict people's guns at all... even despite the occasional nutcase with a gun in a restaurant or office building. Some of them wrote and ratified the 2nd amendment for that exact reason.

The "gun control" advocates hate that idea. The idea of people being free to defend themselves, and even choose the means they use to do it, strikes at the heart of the leftists' agenda to have them completely dependent on government. No matter how inefficient and counterproductive, and even mortally dangerous, that dependency is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2017, 11:51 AM
 
29,531 posts, read 9,704,508 times
Reputation: 3466
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I didn't say it was BECAUSE they're Black. BIG difference.

Hard to believe you don't understand the difference.
My focus was and still is what you DID write, not what you didn't. You're the one struggling with that difference, because you don't understand it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2017, 11:53 AM
 
29,531 posts, read 9,704,508 times
Reputation: 3466
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Take a guess... Would this crime be committed by two little old white grannies?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.cdf78b2dec6c
I'm guessing you are trying to miss the point with these ridiculous comparisons. Close?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top