Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-07-2017, 01:28 AM
 
Location: Virginia
1,743 posts, read 991,486 times
Reputation: 1768

Advertisements

I originally thought that this was from The Onion.
Unfortunately .. It isn't!

Quote:
Federal disability law requires movie theaters to provide specialized interpreters to patrons who are deaf and blind, an appeals court said Friday.

The Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Cinemark, the nation’s third-largest movie chain, in a case involving a Pennsylvania man who wanted to see the 2014 movie “Gone Girl” and asked a Cinemark theater in Pittsburgh to supply a “tactile interpreter.” The theater denied his request.

The plaintiff, Paul McGann, is a movie enthusiast who reads American Sign Language through touch. He uses a method of tactile interpretation that involves placing his hands over the hands of an interpreter who uses sign language to describe the movie’s action, dialogue and even the audience response.
https://apnews.com/1774bf2e55414b959...-blind-patrons
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-07-2017, 03:56 AM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,203,740 times
Reputation: 35012
He ought to invest in his own tactile interpreter so he can watch tv as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 05:04 AM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,716,580 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by claymoore View Post
I originally thought that this was from The Onion.
Unfortunately .. It isn't!



https://apnews.com/1774bf2e55414b959...-blind-patrons
Such as it is in a culture that has allowed the left to purge all but the last molecules of common sense. The ADA is right up there with the most ridiculous Federal legislation ever enacted.

The acres of never used and wasted parking space that surrounds office buildings has, for years, been reason enough to repeal it. And that's clearly only the tip of the iceberg.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 05:15 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,698 posts, read 34,542,421 times
Reputation: 29285
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
Such as it is in a culture that has allowed the left to purge all but the last molecules of common sense. The ADA is right up there with the most ridiculous Federal legislation ever enacted.

The acres of never used and wasted parking space that surrounds office buildings has, for years, been reason enough to repeal it. And that's clearly only the tip of the iceberg.
it's completely ridiculous. how the hell are the thousands of theaters around the country supposed to accommodate this foolishness?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 05:18 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
This is what progressivism gets you. Government owns you and your business. Even though no ones rights have been violated government gets to tell you what to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 05:40 AM
 
2,212 posts, read 1,073,651 times
Reputation: 1381
The price of tickets will go up if theaters have to have interpreters "on call" just in case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 05:44 AM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,884 posts, read 10,972,072 times
Reputation: 14180
theaters are dying on the vine as it is. We have been to shows where we were the only people in the place. Court rulings such as this might just put another nail in the coffin.
Then the guy can find his own interpreter so he can "watch" rented movies on his tv. Who knows, he might get lucky and find a volunteer!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 05:53 AM
 
2,212 posts, read 1,073,651 times
Reputation: 1381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven View Post
theaters are dying on the vine as it is. We have been to shows where we were the only people in the place. Court rulings such as this might just put another nail in the coffin.
Then the guy can find his own interpreter so he can "watch" rented movies on his tv. Who knows, he might get lucky and find a volunteer!
I stopped going years ago. Between cell phone usage and crying babies the experience just wasn't enjoyable anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 06:13 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,594,858 times
Reputation: 9169
A lot of theatres already have closed captioning screenings for the deaf.

But for the blind, couldn't the theatre just give the person an ear piece that visually describes scenes with a pre-recorded voice track from the studio?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 06:24 AM
 
13,684 posts, read 9,006,517 times
Reputation: 10405
Before this thread gets out of hand, a few points:

It is the ruling by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which cover Delaware, New Jersey and most, but not all, of Pennsylvania. The ruling only applies to the area covered.

The article noted that the US Department of Justice filed documents in support of the plaintiff.

For those interested, here is a link to the opinion, which I have not yet read in depth:

McGann v. Cinemark USA Inc, No. 16-2160 (3d Cir. 2017) :: Justia

The Court did note that the Ninth Circuit had reached a similar conclusion. It is unclear from a brief reading of other Circuits have reached an opposite conclusion. If so, then the case is ripe for appeal to the US Supreme Court. The Third Circuit did remand part of the case so that a decision could be made on the 'undue burden' issue.


Perhaps those with knowledge of current technology could answer this question: is there available now, or potentially available, devices (smart phones, tablets, what have you) that have apps or such that can provide help for those with a vision or hearing disability to experience movies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top