Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I so hope you are right. It isn't the 'left' discussion -- it's reading Trump's tweets and trying to figure out what he is meaning - -without any media involved...just readnig his tweets, listening to him talk.
Why suggest you are going to do more? I don't get it.
He's playing games and to me this is not a time to play games...or he's serious and that's scary.
Either way -- lose, lose ....
It is a left - right issue as you demonstrate. Lose, lose. That is consistently the position of the left. If Trump does this he loses. If he does the opposite he loses. He is always presented in a no win for him position regardless of what he does.
Why would anyone listen to someone who admits they can't figure out what is said or meant by what is said ?
Anybody who wants to see a nuclear holocaust and/or hasn't considered the cost of nuclear war and what the aftermath would look like is a deplorable.
Please point out anyone who wants this.
I thought so.
You simply created a topic to bash Trump and anyone who supports him. Nothing more too it than that.
IF you really want to talk about the prospects of a nuclear war, then drop the Trump Derangement and especially the commentary about 10s of millions of people you don't know. But I don't think you have it in you.
What would they do? Take on the US Military? I don't think so.
Chinese state-owned paper says China will intervene and stop America if it attacks North Korea first - and will only stay neutral if Kim attacks the States first
If the US did a first strike, China would do something.
If NK did something first, China would sit it out.
That is what would happen.
China's leadership isn't going to do something that will lead to the deaths of hundreds of millions of its people, and surely not on behalf of NK. China isn't going to fire nukes at us.
China may intervene in a conventional war, but not a nuclear war.
China's leadership isn't going to do something that will lead to the deaths of hundreds of millions of its people, and surely not on behalf of NK. China isn't going to fire nukes at us.
Never said they would fire nukes. See above post. number 44
Chinese state-owned paper says China will intervene and stop America if it attacks North Korea first - and will only stay neutral if Kim attacks the States first
Of all the nations on earth, the one least likely to be attacked is the USA.
Even a little tinpot tyrant like Kim completely understands that a launch on America means he and his fellow Norks die in minutes and their "country" becomes an uninhabitable wasteland for decades. No more goose stepping parades, no more imported western porn flicks, no more "adoring crowds."
Besides, we have systems in place to knock down whatever NK can muster.
NK is a threat to the US like I'm a threat to one of those UFC fighters.
Everybody should be scared of nuclear war. I think Carl Sagan once made a calculation that all it would take to wipe out humanity would be a "limited" nuclear exchange targeting only 100 cities. That would be enough to start a nuclear winter.
But my question is what would China do? You and the communists that write that paper don't seem to have an answer to that.
They would "intervene", that is what they said.
This is their official talk. My guess is that they would keep on negotiating, maybe selling weapons to NK like they always do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.