Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-06-2017, 08:30 AM
JRR
 
Location: Middle Tennessee
8,165 posts, read 5,659,209 times
Reputation: 15703

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak80 View Post
Trump knows that the coal miners are suckers. He knows that the coal miners will support him even if the jobs don’t come back.

Trump can spot a sucker a mile away and he knows how to play them; that’s how he got rich.
Maybe calling the miners suckers is a bit harsh? When times are tough and people are in a situation where they are grasping at straws, they might have the feeling that they have nothing to lose. In their eyes, it didn't look like Hillary was going to do much for them
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2017, 08:59 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
There's still going to be the massive imbalance between Wyoming and Appalachian coal. If the regs are lifted, Wyoming coal will still be more economically viable. Lifting regs won't suddenly make Appalachian coal more desirable when there's billions of tons left in Wyoming that's super easy to mine compared to Appalachian coal.

Now which regs are hampering coal production out East, that isn't affecting Western coal?
I'm not sure what your point is because you are basically parroting what I said. What I said was,

Quote:
Appalachian coal as a percentage of the coal we burn has been in decline since the 70's when they started mining in the Powder River Basin. I don't think there is any expectation that decline will not continue no matter what the case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 09:01 AM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,728,101 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRR View Post
Except, per my relatives in West Virginia, they don't want to go to where the jobs are. They are waiting for the jobs to come back to them.
I have a relative in West Virginia who died in the mines. The death certificate reads "head crushed by rock". Others got out of mining and retrained to work on the railroads or chemical plant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 09:04 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Don't forget China. We got a lot of foreign competition
Chinese exports of coal are never going to amount to anything because they need it..... You asked previously how long 25 billion tans could last. At current rates for the US that's about 30 years, it's only 5 years for China.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 09:06 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by engineman View Post
The opportunity here is for other industries to move in and employ the displaced miners. That will not happen if rabid unionism prevails.
Only about 20% of the mines are unionized and this is an industry where the average salary is around $80K plus bennies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 09:09 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
And no one here has mentioned another factor - increasing automation.
Nothing new, the work of 200 miners 100 years ago can be done by one guy today. This affects all industries and employees per production is always going down no matter what industry it is. This is completely separate than overall production which rose just about every year until 2008.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 09:12 AM
 
Location: USA
18,492 posts, read 9,159,286 times
Reputation: 8525
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRR View Post
Maybe calling the miners suckers is a bit harsh? When times are tough and people are in a situation where they are grasping at straws, they might have the feeling that they have nothing to lose. In their eyes, it didn't look like Hillary was going to do much for them
There’s no question that Hillary would have screwed them over too. Neither party gives a hoot about the average struggling American. Ain’t no money in it.

But voting for a rich con man from New York City is every bit as foolish as voting for a neoliberal Democrat like Hillary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 09:16 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
That was a dangerous gamble he played. Because those miners that voted for him, expecting their old jobs to come roaring back,
The problem here is you assume everyone is stupid, they are not. People in this industry are very well of the other issues plaguing this industry. What they also know is Trump is removing policies that harm the industry they work in, they will most certainly be voting for him again mining job or no mining job because he is doing what he can. It's a hell of lot more that they will ever see from the next Democratic nominee who will inevitably be pandering to the environmentalists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 09:17 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,524,110 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Trump says coal is going to come roaring back though. And by coal, pretty sure he meant WV, KY, and VA
He specifically promised WV when he was in WV. That is why many in WV voted for him.

Heck, even Big Coal owners didn't think coal was coming back to WV. That didn't stop Trump from making an empty promise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 09:18 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRR View Post
Maybe calling the miners suckers is a bit harsh?
I encourage this because it's comments like this that have helped put Trump in the White House.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top