Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, just as it is your opinion that she is a credible witness. This isn't a court of law. No facts have to be verified. I've been told this several times on this topic.
Politically, not handing over the yearbook gave Moore a win regarding that accusation. Given it was the most serious accusation, an attempted rape, that cast doubt on the other accusations.
I've not tried to state anything as FACT as to her credibility. Learn the difference between facts and opinions. You can state your opinion, but it does not mean it's a FACT.
I've not tried to state anything as FACT as to her credibility. Learn the difference between facts and opinions. You can state your opinion, but it does not mean it's a FACT.
I never said it is fact, but no reason to believe her claim if she refuses to let experts look at the ink. She could send her own experts as well. This is how it would work in court. Plaintiffs are cross examined.
I am not wed to Roy Moore, but I see no reason Republican voters should give the seat to a abortion supporting Democrat.
This whole forged yearbook thing is dumb. If someone were going to go to the trouble of faking a signature to frame Moore, they would have done more than make a slightly creepy note to a girl who, although much younger than Moore, was of age.
Alred is a lot smarter than to put her Reputation on the line over a forgery. Very likely she had it verified.
I can say that because there is nothing that disproves my assertion, and she is refusing to allow it be disproved. A likely reason is she knows that it can be shown to be new ink.
I say let's have 10 experts look at the ink and writing, selected by a variety of groups.
There is no reason to link to others. If his assistant did it once, it makes sense she did it numerous times. Explain your reasoning why it would only be a one time deal.
I believe she was interviewed and said she always initialed his signature stamp. And she also said she doesnt' believe the accusations. This is a woman that worked closely with the man for years. Why should we disbelieve this woman?
There are, on the other hand, numerous examples of Moore's signature followed by his assistant's initials.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
