Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-21-2018, 06:33 AM
 
4,345 posts, read 2,790,721 times
Reputation: 5821

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by my54ford View Post
Answer honestly.. What will you say when they ban AR's and wack jobs start using a 12 gauge with OO buck....
It's much slower to shoot and hurts the shooter if you shoot too much at one time. At least it did me.

All we have to do is make the child murder's task more difficult. Not impossible because nothing is impossible. Just don't make it so easy for him. Given that all these mass killers used AR-15s or similar, that's where we should focus.

 
Old 02-21-2018, 06:34 AM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,212 posts, read 19,509,699 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96 View Post
Using a phrase like "gun humpers" is not only counterproductive when trying to convince someone of the validity of your point of view. ......it also telegraphs that you are quite probably full of cow dung when you claim to be a "rational gun owner".

Or even a gun owner at all.

Deal with that.
I don't need to convince you of anything. I don't care if you believe me or not. But in case you were wondering, M1 carbine (2/44 manufacture date, General Motors), Colt M1911 .45 and a Sig .380 for CC.
 
Old 02-21-2018, 06:34 AM
 
58,958 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by chitownperson View Post
The only long term solution that will make a significant impact on gun violence in the U.S. is to have a national ban on all firearms. Anything short of that, such as state to state bans, assault weapons bans etc. will have little impact on mass shootings in the U.S. (though starting the conversation on bans and heavy regulations is a step in the right direction).

For people who support gun rights, it doesn't matter what you say about your rights to gun ownership, or about who arming the "good guys" will make society safer etc. the reality is, if the U.S. doesn't have a national ban on all gun ownership, gun violence in the U.S. will not change, and mass shooting and school shootings will continue.

I know people will respond by saying the "bad guys" will not give up their guns, and that's why the "good guys" need guns… but the long tern strategy is for the "bad guys" guns to get confiscated, and not let them replenish their supply.

This is the ONLY way to make a significant dent in U.S. gun violence. Regardless of your politics, how responsible of a gun owner you think you are, your belief in gun rights etc. No other solution will make a difference.
"]The only long term solution that will make a significant impact on gun violence in the U.S. is to have a national ban on all firearms."

Right!

The Constitutional amendment BANNING ALL ALCOHOL turned out so WELL!

The "War on Drugs" has worked out so well.

I swear I think many posters on here live in the parents basements and seldom ever come put!
 
Old 02-21-2018, 06:36 AM
 
58,958 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by chitownperson View Post
YOUR guns may not hurt anyone (may), but the laws that allow you to possess your guns means that there are limitless guns in the U.S. many of which will hurt and kill many people, so your privilege or right to have your “safe” guns means that many will die from others. Seems like a trade off you and many others are willing to make.

At this point is not about “if” we will have another school shooting, it’s about “when” and how many kids will die in the next one, and the ones after that. If there isn’t a national ban for all firearms, there is absolutely no hope that these mass shootings will stop. Things like arming teachers etc. are short term and short sighted bandages (and not good bandages) for this problem.

My proposal is the only one that will make any kind of long term difference, whether you like it or not.
"but the laws that allow you to possess your guns"

The Bill of RIGHTS are NOT laws. "Shall NOT BE INFRINGED"!
 
Old 02-21-2018, 06:37 AM
 
4,345 posts, read 2,790,721 times
Reputation: 5821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"the founding fathers in no way wanted people to have free reign with guns"

REALLY?

"A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined..."
- George Washington, First Annual Address, to both House of Congress, January 8, 1790 "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787
"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
"A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
"On every occasion [of Constitutional interpretation] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying [to force] what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [instead let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 12 June 1823
"I enclose you a list of the killed, wounded, and captives of the enemy from the commencement of hostilities at Lexington in April, 1775, until November, 1777, since which there has been no event of any consequence ... I think that upon the whole it has been about one half the number lost by them, in some instances more, but in others less. This difference is ascribed to our superiority in taking aim when we fire; every soldier in our army having been intimate with his gun from his infancy."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Giovanni Fabbroni, June 8, 1778
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
"To disarm the people...[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them."
- George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adooption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788
"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers."
- George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops."
- Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787
"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of."
- James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country."
- James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789
"...the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone..."
- James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783
“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."
- Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
- Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778
"This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty.... The right of self defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction."
- St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1803
"The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms, like law, discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The balance ofpower is the scale of peace. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. And while a single nation refuses to lay them down, it is proper that all should keep them up. Horrid mischief would ensue were one-half the world deprived of the use of them; for while avarice and ambition have a place in the heart of man, the weak will become a prey to the strong. The history of every age and nation establishes these truths, and facts need but little arguments when they prove themselves."
- Thomas Paine, "Thoughts on Defensive War" in Pennsylvania Magazine, July 1775
"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
- Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788
"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."
- Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, 1833
"What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty .... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins."
- Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, I Annals of Congress 750, August 17, 1789
"For it is a truth, which the experience of ages has attested, that the people are always most in danger when the means of injuring their rights are in the possession of those of whom they entertain the least suspicion."
- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 25, December 21, 1787
"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair."
- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28
"[i]f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."
- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28, January 10, 1788
"As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms."
- Tench Coxe, Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789"
Back to the main Famous Gun Quotes page.

  • 546479 reads
This is very nice but they should still ban AR-15s. That wouldn't conflict with any of these pious utterings.
 
Old 02-21-2018, 06:42 AM
 
58,958 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by chitownperson View Post
No, I don't, and I never said that… read my post again.

What I DID say is that there will never be "long term significant change" in gun violence without an all out national ban of all firearms.
If you feel SO STRONGLY about your idea, I have a deal for you.

I will give up MY Constitutional RIGHT "to keep and bear arms" when EVERYONE IN America give up their 1st amendment rights.

Apply EVERY gun law to the 1st amendment that NOW applies to the 2nd amendment.

Do we have deal?

The Founding father's thought so MUCH about "to keep and bear arms" they made it the SECOND amendment right after the FIRST.
 
Old 02-21-2018, 06:46 AM
 
58,958 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by chitownperson View Post
Actually, I DO have the right to determine that guns should be banned… It's up to the government however to act in the best interest of it's people, which it's not currently doing. I have the right to express my belief that only a total ban will create significant change in gun violence, and that any other half measure, or no measure as it currently stands, will not do a thing to lower gun violence in the short or long term.
"I DO have the right to determine that guns should be banned…"

You are correct, so when are you gong to start a movement to get rid of the 2nd amendment .

That is the ONLY way you are going to get your wish.

"t's up to the government however to act in the best interest of it's people,"

Most of them are by ADHERING TO THE CONSTITUTION.
 
Old 02-21-2018, 06:46 AM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,453 posts, read 7,080,753 times
Reputation: 11699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troyfan View Post
It's much slower to shoot and hurts the shooter if you shoot too much at one time. At least it did me.

All we have to do is make the child murder's task more difficult. Not impossible because nothing is impossible. Just don't make it so easy for him. Given that all these mass killers used AR-15s or similar, that's where we should focus.


A pump action shotgun that hold 8 rounds, you can empty the tube in 4 seconds easy.

Tacitcal reloads (putting one shell in the chamber from the side) takes about 1-2 seconds for someone with a little practice.

Reduced recoil loads are available and still incredibly powerful, but pain from recoil probably wouldn't be much of an issue for a shooter in that situation....adrenaline works wonders.

There aren't many weapons that can equal the potential devastation of a 12 guage pump shotgun in close quarters.
 
Old 02-21-2018, 06:47 AM
 
4,345 posts, read 2,790,721 times
Reputation: 5821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
If you feel SO STRONGLY about your idea, I have a deal for you.

I will give up MY Constitutional RIGHT "to keep and bear arms" when EVERYONE IN America give up their 1st amendment rights.

Apply EVERY gun law to the 1st amendment that NOW applies to the 2nd amendment.

Do we have deal?

The Founding father's thought so MUCH about "to keep and bear arms" they made it the SECOND amendment right after the FIRST.
Banning all guns is the extremist of positions. But it is what will happen unless other gun restrictions are adopted. One way or another. If not by amendment then by anti-gun judges who will be appointed if Republicans don't that their heads out of their posteriors. The NRA is the short-sightedest of lobbying groups.

Gun people should support banning AR-15s and similar. Wake up and smell the coffee.
 
Old 02-21-2018, 06:49 AM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,453 posts, read 7,080,753 times
Reputation: 11699
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
I don't need to convince you of anything. I don't care if you believe me or not. But in case you were wondering, M1 carbine (2/44 manufacture date, General Motors), Colt M1911 .45 and a Sig .380 for CC.



Be that as it may, your use of liberalspeak like "foaming at the mouth gun humpers" belies your lack of ability to communicate in a meaningful or rational fashion with those who you disagree with.

Gun owner or not.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top