Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I was opposed to the Iraq War and can agree with you on it. But this thread is about nuclear weapons. C'mon, you're smarter than that.
Frank isn't talking just Iraq... drone bombings in foreign lands other than Iraq and Afghanistan.
Ghaddafi is one off the top of my head.
His context is similar to that of the great firearm argument...
How is one device okay (any semi auto chambered in 223/556) and another not(AR15)?
Afterall I thought liberals wanted Trump impeached? Wouldn't you want him to launch a nuke to start war without congressional approval? Or without secretary of defenses approval to use one where we are at war?
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Nothing to do with Trump, a nuclear first strike, one not prompted by an attack on US interests, should require a Declaration of War be issued by Congress.
Nothing to do with Trump, a nuclear first strike, one not prompted by an attack on US interests, should require a Declaration of War be issued by Congress.
Agree 100%.
If he is using nukes because we have been attacked or and attempt was made then let them do their job, preemptive is another story all together.
Nothing to do with Trump, a nuclear first strike, one not prompted by an attack on US interests, should require a Declaration of War be issued by Congress.
I agree with this. Though the fact is that this issue is only being raised because Trump is in power. If he were not, these hearing would not even be held.
Frank isn't talking just Iraq... drone bombings in foreign lands other than Iraq and Afghanistan.
Ghaddafi is one off the top of my head.
His context is similar to that of the great firearm argument...
How is one device okay (any semi auto chambered in 223/556) and another not(AR15)?
Afterall I thought liberals wanted Trump impeached? Wouldn't you want him to launch a nuke to start war without congressional approval? Or without secretary of defenses approval to use one where we are at war?
I did not agree with Iraq or Libya or any other major foreign military intervention save Afghanistan after 9/11.
As to your other thoughts, well..,let's just say they should have stayed in your head.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by TreeBeard
I agree with this. Though the fact is that this issue is only being raised because Trump is in power. If he were not, these hearing would not even be held.
I think his juvenile tirades on Twitter may have something to do with it too.
lmao...What nonsense. All those having this hearing need to go, they are useless. There is corruption from top to the bottom in all of Congress and this is what they have hearings on. It's a distraction folks, they are trying to steer things away from their own failed policies and corruption.
I agree with this. Though the fact is that this issue is only being raised because Trump is in power. If he were not, these hearing would not even be held.
He is just the eye opener, this suggestion should be applied to All future Presidents, and it is almost surprising that no one has suggested it before now.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
