Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
this is inexcusable and 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000X worse than ANYTHING Roy Moore was accused of.
and yet dems don't care their party is morally corrupt and run by sexists like Nancy and Chuck, if they believed what they said they should clean their party out from top to bottom before they even consider criticizing Trump or Roy.
They chose a woman as their candidate last year, and women are increasingly becoming the face of the Democratic party. You even mentioned one of them yourself in the OP.
Who led the first great opposition to our new president? Remember? it was called the Million Women March? The one with all the pink knitted hats?
I'm pretty sure there weren't many Republicans in that one. And Moore never joined them, that's for sure.
So don't try to lay 'morally corrupt' on the Democrats. There's plenty of it to go around in our non-political lives, but it's not something that can be laid at the feet of either party. After all, there are a few Republican women who are emerging as national leaders, too, even if there are more Democratic women at the lead of their party.
this is inexcusable and 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000X worse than ANYTHING Roy Moore was accused of.
and yet dems don't care their party is morally corrupt and run by sexists like Nancy and Chuck, if they believed what they said they should clean their party out from top to bottom before they even consider criticizing Trump or Roy.
Don't know what this nonsense is, especially since Kennedy has been dead for years now
They chose a woman as their candidate last year, and women are increasingly becoming the face of the Democratic party. You even mentioned one of them yourself in the OP.
Who led the first great opposition to our new president? Remember? it was called the Million Women March? The one with all the pink knitted hats?
I'm pretty sure there weren't many Republicans in that one. And Moore never joined them, that's for sure.
So don't try to lay 'morally corrupt' on the Democrats. There's plenty of it to go around in our non-political lives, but it's not something that can be laid at the feet of either party. After all, there are a few Republican women who are emerging as national leaders, too, even if there are more Democratic women at the lead of their party.
And Hillary was and is the most anti-woman person alive. Remember the bimbo explosion.
this is inexcusable and 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000X worse than ANYTHING Roy Moore was accused of.
and yet dems don't care their party is morally corrupt and run by sexists like Nancy and Chuck, if they believed what they said they should clean their party out from top to bottom before they even consider criticizing Trump or Roy.
not true - you are making stuff up in your head.
Clinton or Kennedy couldn't be elected today with the information highway we have going on and our social pressure.
But go ahead -- feel like conservatives are the victim because Moore is a creepy sex guy.
Clinton or Kennedy couldn't be elected today with the information highway we have going on and our social pressure.
But go ahead -- feel like conservatives are the victim because Moore is a creepy sex guy.
always excuses. Roy didn't do anything but "we dems would never do it again" sure thing, you wanted the clintons back in the white house just a year ago.
Yes he was responsible for a girl who died in a car accident,who has ever denied that?Ted Kennedy is dead move on.
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, and Hillary Clinton to start.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.