Which political party defends/tolerates its perverts the most? (legal, Obama, lobby)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Once you get to high school, you'll learn signals. There are things like flirting and innuendo that are signals.
Start paying attention, and you most likely won't die a virgin.
See, us non-sexual assaulters read and heard what Trump said and recognize that Trump admitted to not waiting for signals -- he just does it when he feels like doing it.
To those of us who manage to go through life without sexually assaulting women, we see 16 women coming forward as corroborating what Trump's already admitted to.
To those of us who are numerate and averse to sexual assault, we recognize that the odds of 16 women all lying about one man sexually assaulting them is improbable, especially considering that one man has admitted his MO is to sexually assault women.
The fact that you have to twist his words and create bubbles for two obviously connected events -- a man admitting his MO is a sexually assault, and women coming forward claiming he sexually assaulted them -- says as much about you as it does about Trump.
It is pretty evident that the cult of the Donald exists. Its members twist their minds into a condition of ignoring his own words in order glorify him as something other than the creepy perv he is.
Oh, this stupid question?
Once you get to high school, you'll learn signals. There are things like flirting and innuendo that are signals.
Start paying attention, and you most likely won't die a virgin.
Or you might interpret those "signals" incorrectly and go to prison for rape, but hey at least you won't be a virgin
I put his full quote in context unlike some other trolls. According to Trump... he does it automatically, without waiting for any go ahead. Please explain to us non-rapists how you understand where permission was granted for Trump to grab ***** when he admits he doesn't even wait for permission?
And knowing that his MO is to not wait for permission before he sexually assaultn someone... Why are you surprised that there are women who have claimed he sexually assaulted them?
No, if you put it in context, you cannot exclude the "they let" part, which shows consent and movies/gives different meaning to the larger statement. They cannot be separated. Nice try. Ultimately, you may choose to give a meaning that is distinct and separate from the actual verbiage of Trump's statement, but that's all you and other leftists have. You cannot point to the actual language to support. Prior to stating "they let you do it," he states "I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait." You, like most rabid, anti Trump folks, behave as if he is describing sexual assault (the "they let you" comment put aside for a second) when this is common practice among consenting adults. If out for a date or in a room where sexual tensions are running high, who in the world, man or woman, doesn't move in for the kiss if the mood/vibe is there? You choose to assign non-consensual activity to language that is not automatically that, which is a shame. Unlike how certain loony leftists want the world of consent to function where every sexual action has to be verbally consented to (never mind that verbal cues play a huge role in consent) that's not how things work or should work. You claim that Trump's statements show that he doesn't wait for signals, when in reality they don't touch on that subject one way or the other (we do, of course, have the "they let you" consenting comment). But instead of questioning whether he did wait for signals, you automatically make the comments out to be nonconsensual, which shows your partisan stripes.
See, us non-sexual assaulters read and heard what Trump said and recognize that Trump admitted to not waiting for signals -- he just does it when he feels like doing it.
To those of us who manage to go through life without sexually assaulting women, we see 16 women coming forward as corroborating what Trump's already admitted to.
To those of us who are numerate and averse to sexual assault, we recognize that the odds of 16 women all lying about one man sexually assaulting them is improbable, especially considering that one man has admitted his MO is to sexually assault women.
The fact that you have to twist his words and create bubbles for two obviously connected events -- a man admitting his MO is a sexually assault, and women coming forward claiming he sexually assaulted them -- says as much about you as it does about Trump.
You might have read it, but you certainly didn't understand it.
When you figure out what "could" means, get back to us.
Monica was technically to consent as she was of age, but there is a reason why bosses sleeping with people far down the ladder in the chain of command is frowned upon. Specifically, the power imbalance makes it less likely for a less powerful person to turn down the advances of his or her more powerful employer. In this case, that more powerful employer just happened to be the most powerful man in the world. Of course, this doesn't even get into the many other women who have accused Bill of rape and other sexual assault.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.