Trump brags about seeking out naked underage girls (Canada, politicians, election)

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA

If you can't defend the content, attack the source, eh? Did you grabber-in-chief say that, or didn't he?

The commends have been rehashed dozens upon dozens of times here.. Liberals are just YEARS behind the rest of us..

[Ted Bear]

Donald is a dotard...a moron in modern terms.


He is boxed into a corner on the issue of fooling around with underage children and other heinous behaviors. He can't say anything about Moore or Franken or any of the other pervs because he leads the pack. There is enough documented evidence on him to put him away forever. Nobody will throw the first stone, so we are at impasse. Anyone who makes a charge is themselves exposed... and that hasn't turned out well.


DC spent $15 million of taxpayer dollars paying off women who have been sexually assaulted n the halls of Washington. No names please. That means a LOT of people (men) are in the same situation and wake at night sweating that they will be the next one exposed (no pun intended).

[ohhwanderlust]

Originally Posted by Travel Crazy

heavyweight is on a tear. Trying so hard to drum-up something because Russia, Russia, Russia! has turned out to be a nothing burger.

Has the DNC upped your wages yet...or is it still $7.50 p/hour and a popsicle?

How much do you get paid to blindly worship Trump?

You do realize it's possible for someone to be involved in more than one scandal, right?

[ohhwanderlust]

Originally Posted by saltine

This is old news. Try to keep up.

So is Al Franken and Bill Clinton then.

[lisanicole1]

I do not condone this kind of behavior. Its gross. I wonder how many people listening to Stern (especially men) had a problem with it when this aired on the Stern show.

[ndcairngorm]

Originally Posted by Ted Bear

He is boxed into a corner on the issue of fooling around with underage children and other heinous behaviors. He can't say anything about Moore or Franken or any of the other pervs because he leads the pack. There is enough documented evidence on him to put him away forever. Nobody will throw the first stone, so we are at impasse. Anyone who makes a charge is themselves exposed... and that hasn't turned out well.

I do, however, think it is only a matter of time until we start hearing from women who have had problems with Trump.

[saltine]

Originally Posted by ohhwanderlust

So is Al Franken and Bill Clinton then.

Franken is new revelation. Clinton not. Catch up would ya?

Originally Posted by ndcairngorm

I do, however, think it is only a matter of time until we start hearing from women who have had problems with Trump.

ok, what rock have you been living under? C’mon people.

[burdell]

Originally Posted by ndcairngorm

I do, however, think it is only a matter of time until we start hearing from women who have had problems with Trump.

Start hearing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald...ct_allegations

[RedZin]

Originally Posted by Wayland Woman

How is it old news when he just weighed in on Mr. Franken's situation? #45 is not above reproach here to be speaking on matters like this.

Him trying to talk down to Franken was the most blatantly hypocritical thing I've seen him tweet since taking office.

Et tu, Twitler?

[RedZin]

Originally Posted by lisanicole1

I do not condone this kind of behavior. Its gross. I wonder how many people listening to Stern (especially men) had a problem with it when this aired on the Stern show.

It's documented. He admitted to it. About a half-dozen women from those pageants have spoken out about it.

And... crickets from the RNC and his supporters.

Yet, they want to take Franken out back and roast him alive over a kiss he got consent to give and a photo that (while juvenile and tasteless) shows him hovering over the chest of a fully-clothed adult female who was wearing body armor.

Get outta here.

/smh